From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933693Ab2AKSDa (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:03:30 -0500 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:2453 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933656Ab2AKSDX (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:03:23 -0500 Message-ID: <4F0DCEE5.5090100@parallels.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:03:17 +0400 From: Stanislav Kinsbursky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111109 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Trond Myklebust CC: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , Pavel Emelianov , "neilb@suse.de" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , James Bottomley , "bfields@fieldses.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "devel@openvz.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] NFS: create blocklayout pipe per network namesapce context References: <20111129090754.20730.64567.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <1325285705.10984.4.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1325797111.11084.22.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <4F0C35F3.7060508@parallels.com> <1326299003.17212.7.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <4F0DC582.6030805@parallels.com> <1326303963.19024.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> In-Reply-To: <1326303963.19024.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 11.01.2012 21:46, Trond Myklebust пишет: > On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 21:23 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: >> I've sent rebased "v2" of the patch set, contains updated patch "SUNRPC: handle >> RPC client pipefs dentries by network namespace aware routine", which, I >> believe, fixes oops, spotted by Bryan (it was caused by excessive call of >> rpc_put_mount() on PipeFS dentries unlink). >> So, if I'm not mistaken here, there's no need in implementing of dummy versions >> of rpc_pipefs_notifier_(un)register() or any other dummy stuff. > > OK. Fair enough. We'll give it some testing to make sure that we don't > hit it again... > >> BTW, it looks like that in last 2 days I've sent all updates to the issues you >> pointed out. If not, please, ping me once more. > > I'm in the process of reviewing it right now. > Cool, thanks, Trond. > Cheers > Trond > -- Best regards, Stanislav Kinsbursky