linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix broken build by rearranging some #includes
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:49:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F15C2A6.3010708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F152255.4080409@gmail.com>

On 01/16/2012 11:25 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi, again
>
> 2012-01-17 11:01 AM, David Daney wrote:
>> From: David Daney<david.daney@cavium.com>
>>
>> When building on my Debian/mips system, util/util.c fails to build
>> because commit 1aed2671738785e8f5aea663a6fda91aa7ef59b5 (perf kvm: Do
>> guest-only counting by default) indirectly includes stdio.h before the
>> feature selection in util.h is done. This prevents _GNU_SOURCE in
>> util.h from enabling the declaration of getline(), from now second
>> inclusion of stdio.h, and the build is broken.
>>
>> There is another breakage in util/evsel.c caused by include ordering,
>> but I didn't fully track down the commit that caused it.
>>
>> Since the #include situation is a little convoluted throughout perf, I
>> did the following:
>>
>> 1) Always include util/util.h before all other include files.
>>
>> 2) Remove all #define _GNU_SOURCE, as it is already done in util.h.
>>
>> 3) Remove all #undef _GNU_SOURCE, as they don't do what a naive person
>> might expect (or much of anything for that matter) and clutter up
>> the source.
>>
>> 4) #include ctype.h in util.h, so that ctype things have uniform
>> definitions throughout perf.
>>
>> 5) Remove #define of _FILE_OFFSET_BITS where util/util.h is already
>> providing it.
>>
>> This gives me a clean build on x86_64 (fc12) and mips (Debian).
>
> Instead of reordering, how about adding -D_GNU_SOURCE on Makefile and
> removing the line from util.h? If util.h would always be included at
> first, the end result should be same, right? And this way, we don't need
> to care about the ordering anymore.
>

Yeah, that is better.  I had tried it first, but then reversed course as 
I found so many random #define _GNU_SOURCE, that I thought there must 
have been a reason.

Upon further thought on the subject, I think you are right.  We need to 
present a consistent set of features.h defines to the entire perf program.

I withdraw this patch from consideration, and will send a new one soon, 
that does the -D_GNU_SOURCE.

David Daney

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-17 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-17  2:01 [PATCH] perf: Fix broken build by rearranging some #includes David Daney
2012-01-17  7:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-01-17  7:25 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-01-17 18:49   ` David Daney [this message]
2012-01-17  7:25 ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F15C2A6.3010708@gmail.com \
    --to=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).