From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932147Ab2ARKIL (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:08:11 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49289 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757193Ab2ARKIJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:08:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4F1699FE.5050005@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:07:58 +0100 From: Michal Marek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Warren Cc: Mark Salter , Jon Loeliger , David Gibson , Russell King , Aurelien Jacquiot , Michal Simek , Jonas Bonn , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org" , "microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au" , "linux@openrisc.net" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Devicetree Discuss Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Kbuild: Use dtc's -d (dependency) option References: <1326134295-15547-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <1326134295-15547-2-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <1326310587.2535.291.camel@deneb.redhat.com> <4F1206F1.5090405@suse.cz> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF17801D2255@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF17801D2255@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 17.1.2012 18:20, Stephen Warren wrote: > Michal Marek wrote at Saturday, January 14, 2012 3:51 PM: >> As the C6X port has been merged in this merge window, I can't easily >> apply this patch to my kbuild branch and at the same time please Linus >> by basing the pull request on a tagged release. So I'm going to drop the >> arch/c6x part to keep the kbuild branch "pretty" and let either Mark or >> Stephen send the patch to Linus directly, once he has merged the kbuild >> branch. Would that work? > > I was assuming my patches were for 3.4 rather than 3.3, since it's pretty > late for new features in 3.3. In that case, there wouldn't be an issue, > right? OK, that was a misunderstanding then. I applied it to the kbuild branch for 3.3 and Linus pulled it in the meantime. It's not a terribly intrusive change, after all. Michal