linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@elte.hu, acme@redhat.com, robert.richter@amd.com,
	ming.m.lin@intel.com, andi@firstfloor.org, asharma@fb.com,
	ravitillo@lbl.gov, vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu, dsahern@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/18] perf: add support for sampling taken branch to perf record
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:17:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F27B8CE.3010507@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327697778-18515-13-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>

On Saturday 28 January 2012 02:26 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> From: Roberto Agostino Vitillo <ravitillo@lbl.gov>
> 
> This patch adds a new option to enable taken branch stack
> sampling, i.e., leverage the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK feature
> of perf_events.
> 
> There is a new option to active this mode: -b.
> It is possible to pass a set of filters to select the type of
> branches to sample.
> 
> The following filters are available:
> - any : any type of branches
> - any_call : any function call or system call
> - any_ret : any function return or system call return
> - any_ind : any indirect branch
> - u:  only when the branch target is at the user level
> - k: only when the branch target is in the kernel
> - hv: only when the branch target is in the hypervisor
> 
> Filters can be combined by passing a comma separated list
> to the option:
> 
> $ perf record -b any_call,u -e cycles:u branchy
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Agostino Vitillo <ravitillo@lbl.gov>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt |   25 ++++++++++
>  tools/perf/builtin-record.c              |   74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/perf.h                        |    1 +
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c                  |    4 ++
>  4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> index ff9a66e..288d429 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> @@ -152,6 +152,31 @@ an empty cgroup (monitor all the time) using, e.g., -G foo,,bar. Cgroups must ha
>  corresponding events, i.e., they always refer to events defined earlier on the command
>  line.
> 
> +-b::
> +--branch-stack::
> +Enable taken branch stack sampling. Each sample captures a series of consecutive
> +taken branches. The number of branches captured with each sample depends on the
> +underlying hardware, the type of branches of interest, and the executed code.
> +It is possible to select the types of branches captured by enabling filters. The
> +following filters are defined:
> +
> +        -  any :  any type of branches
> +        - any_call: any function call or system call
> +        - any_ret: any function return or system call return
> +        - any_ind: any indirect branch
> +        - u:  only when the branch target is at the user level
> +        - k: only when the branch target is in the kernel
> +        - hv: only when the target is at the hypervisor level
> +
> ++
> +At least one of any, any_call, any_ret, any_ind must be provided. The privilege levels may
> +be ommitted, in which case, the privilege levels of the associated event are applied to the
> +branch filter. Both kernel (k) and hypervisor (hv) privilege levels are subject to
> +permissions.  When sampling on multiple events, branch stack sampling is enabled for all
> +the sampling events. The sampled branch type is the same for all events.
> +Note that taken branch sampling may not be available on all processors.
> +The various filters must be specified as a comma separated list: -b any_ret,u,k
> +
>  SEE ALSO
>  --------
>  linkperf:perf-stat[1], linkperf:perf-list[1]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 32870ee..7df6e68 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -637,6 +637,77 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct perf_record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
>  	return err;
>  }
> 
> +#define BRANCH_OPT(n, m) \
> +	{ .name = n, .mode = (m) }
> +
> +#define BRANCH_END { .name = NULL }
> +
> +struct branch_mode {
> +	const char *name;
> +	int mode;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct branch_mode branch_modes[] = {
> +	BRANCH_OPT("u", PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER),
> +	BRANCH_OPT("k", PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL),
> +	BRANCH_OPT("hv", PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HV),
> +	BRANCH_OPT("any", PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY),
> +	BRANCH_OPT("any_call", PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL),
> +	BRANCH_OPT("any_ret", PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN),
> +	BRANCH_OPT("ind_call", PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL),
> +	BRANCH_END
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +parse_branch_stack(const struct option *opt, const char *str, int unset __used)
> +{
> +#define ONLY_PLM \
> +	(PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER	|\
> +	 PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL	|\
> +	 PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL)

I guess this would be PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HV instead of the second
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL. 

> +
> +	uint64_t *mode = (uint64_t *)opt->value;
> +	const struct branch_mode *br;
> +	char *s, *os, *p;
> +	int ret = -1;
> +
> +	*mode = 0;
> +
> +	/* because str is read-only */
> +	s = os = strdup(str);
> +	if (!s)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	for (;;) {
> +		p = strchr(s, ',');
> +		if (p)
> +			*p = '\0';
> +
> +		for (br = branch_modes; br->name; br++) {
> +			if (!strcasecmp(s, br->name))
> +				break;
> +		}
> +		if (!br->name)
> +			goto error;
> +
> +		*mode |= br->mode;
> +
> +		if (!p)
> +			break;
> +
> +		s = p + 1;
> +	}
> +	ret = 0;
> +
> +	if ((*mode & ~ONLY_PLM) == 0) {
> +		error("need at least one branch type with -b\n");
> +		ret = -1;
> +	}
> +error:
> +	free(os);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static const char * const record_usage[] = {
>  	"perf record [<options>] [<command>]",
>  	"perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]",
> @@ -729,6 +800,9 @@ const struct option record_options[] = {
>  		     "monitor event in cgroup name only",
>  		     parse_cgroups),
>  	OPT_STRING('u', "uid", &record.uid_str, "user", "user to profile"),
> +	OPT_CALLBACK('b', "branch-stack", &record.opts.branch_stack,
> +		     "branch mode mask", "branch stack sampling modes",
> +		     parse_branch_stack),
>  	OPT_END()
>  };
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.h b/tools/perf/perf.h
> index 8b4d25d..7f8fbab 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/perf.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/perf.h
> @@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ struct perf_record_opts {
>  	unsigned int freq;
>  	unsigned int mmap_pages;
>  	unsigned int user_freq;
> +	int	     branch_stack;
>  	u64	     default_interval;
>  	u64	     user_interval;
>  	const char   *cpu_list;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 472fc8c..a65a53c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ void perf_evsel__config(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct perf_record_opts *opts)
>  		attr->watermark = 0;
>  		attr->wakeup_events = 1;
>  	}
> +	if (opts->branch_stack) {
> +		attr->sample_type	|= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK;
> +		attr->branch_sample_type = opts->branch_stack;
> +	}
> 
>  	attr->mmap = track;
>  	attr->comm = track;


-- 
Anshuman Khandual
Linux Technology Centre
IBM Systems and Technology Group


  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-31  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-27 20:56 [PATCH v4 00/18] perf: add support for sampling taken branches Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] perf: add generic taken branch sampling support Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] perf: add Intel LBR MSR definitions Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] perf: add Intel X86 LBR sharing logic Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] perf: sync branch stack sampling with X86 precise_sampling Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] perf: add LBR mappings for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH filters Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] perf: disable LBR support for older Intel Atom processors Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] perf: implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH for Intel X86 Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] perf: add LBR software filter support " Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] perf: disable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* when not supported Stephane Eranian
2012-01-30  3:57   ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] perf: add hook to flush branch_stack on context switch Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] perf: add code to support PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] perf: add support for sampling taken branch to perf record Stephane Eranian
2012-01-31  9:47   ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2012-01-31 10:31     ` Stephane Eranian
2012-01-31 15:44       ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-01-31 15:48         ` Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] perf: add support for taken branch sampling to perf report Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] perf: fix endianness detection in perf.data Stephane Eranian
2012-01-30  5:55   ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] perf: add ABI reference sizes Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] perf: enable reading of perf.data files from different ABI rev Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] perf: fix bug print_event_desc() Stephane Eranian
2012-01-27 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] perf: make perf able to read file from older ABIs Stephane Eranian
2012-01-31  8:54   ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-01-30  4:16 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] perf: add support for sampling taken branches Anshuman Khandual
2012-01-30 10:15   ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-01  8:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2012-02-02 13:23   ` Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F27B8CE.3010507@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=asharma@fb.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravitillo@lbl.gov \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).