From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759573Ab2CIUxX (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:53:23 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:33541 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759497Ab2CIUxW (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:53:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4F5A6D87.4050809@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:52:23 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: =?UTF-8?B?RmVybmFuZG8gTHVpcyBWw6F6cXVleiBDYW8=?= , Don Zickus , linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, Yinghai Lu , akpm@linux-foundation.org, vgoyal@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs References: <20120216172735.GX9751@redhat.com> <20120216215603.GH9751@redhat.com> <20120217195430.GO9751@redhat.com> <20120220151419.GU9751@redhat.com> <20120221135934.GF26998@redhat.com> <4F573E1C.2060909@oss.ntt.co.jp> <4F573E74.5040504@oss.ntt.co.jp> <4F58495B.5080308@oss.ntt.co.jp> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Okay, I need to ask this... Is there a reason to not just simply block these NMIs during the kexec sequence? -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.