From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: care sd_dma_address/len in dmaengine_prep_slave_single()
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:12:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5B3707.1030504@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871up2k4o6.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
On 03/09/2012 01:18 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Lars
>
>> On 01/31/2012 02:13 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>>> dmaengine_prep_slave_single() is helper macro of dmaengine.
>>> But it doesn't have sg_dma_address/len() settings which are required.
>>> And it used void *buf in parameter, but it should be dma_addr_t.
>>> This patch fixes up it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any news regarding this patch? The dmaengine_prep_slave_single in upstream
>> is not really usable as it is right now.
>
> Sorry. I have no news/update for this.
> I'm not good at IOMMU which was pointed by Russell.
>
> Best regards
> ---
> Kuninori Morimoto
Well, he pointed out a minor and easy to fix flaw with the patch. But if you
don't want to resend the patch is it OK for you, if I resend the patch with the
flaw fixed? And is it OK, if I keep your Signed-off-by on that patch?
Thanks,
- Lars
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-10 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 9:25 [PATCH] dmaengine: care sd_dma_address/len in dmaengine_prep_slave_single() Kuninori Morimoto
2012-01-30 9:56 ` Vinod Koul
2012-01-31 1:13 ` [PATCH v2] " Kuninori Morimoto
2012-02-01 18:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-25 14:18 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-04-25 14:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-08 9:48 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-03-09 0:18 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2012-03-10 11:12 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2012-03-13 0:46 ` Kuninori Morimoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5B3707.1030504@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).