From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754989Ab2DRUCP (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:02:15 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:37772 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754938Ab2DRUCL (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:02:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8F1DBD.8000009@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:02:05 -0600 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfram Sang CC: Alok Chauhan , khali@linux-fr.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, swarren@nvidia.com, olof@lixom.net, bones@secretlab.ca, omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com, ccross@android.com, ldewangan@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, dgreid@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: tegra: Add delay before reset the controller References: <1333345982-16595-1-git-send-email-alokc@nvidia.com> <20120418142758.GE19220@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20120418142758.GE19220@pengutronix.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/18/2012 08:27 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:23:02AM +0530, Alok Chauhan wrote: >> NACK interrupt generated before I2C controller generates >> the STOP condition on bus. In Software, because of this >> reset of controller is happening before I2C controller could >> complete STOP condition. So wait for some time before resetting >> the controller so that STOP condition has delivered properly on bus. >> >> Added delay of 2 clock period before reset the >> controller in case of NACK error. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alok Chauhan > > Applied with Stephen's ACK and slightly reworded comment and commit msg. > > Wondering a bit that you want it for 3.5, not for 3.4. Looks like a > bugfix to me. Yes, applying this to 3.4 would make sense. When I said "for 3.5" earlier, I meant I'd like it to at least get into 3.5 not later. Thanks.