From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932231Ab2EUJBa (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2012 05:01:30 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:39921 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932141Ab2EUJB2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2012 05:01:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4FBA0460.1070300@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 10:01:20 +0100 From: Lee Jones User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120410 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: Samuel Ortiz , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree References: <20120521134219.6d6396802bd6a097503bac92@canb.auug.org.au> <4FB9F818.4030801@linaro.org> <20120521184005.3b7661ec6468c5878a22615d@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20120521184005.3b7661ec6468c5878a22615d@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/05/12 09:40, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Mon, 21 May 2012 09:08:56 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: >> >> The patch itself has had extensive build and run testing, with DT both >> enabled and disabled. I'm guessing some other changes may be having and >> influence here. I'm happy to take a look for you. Can you tell me where >> I can pull the offending branch from please? > > The mfd tree can be found here: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sameo/mfd-2.6.git#for-next > > Did you try building it for X86_64? What failed for me was an x86_64 > allmodconfig. That seems broken to me. Why would any of the X86_64 systems be building ab8500-core code? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog