linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/13 v2] kprobes/ftrace: Making ftrace usable for kprobes
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:25:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD84E84.1090001@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120612224327.426900129@goodmis.org>

(2012/06/13 7:43), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> If an arch supports passing of ftrace ops, it must also pass regs.
> But it does not need to support passing regs. By default
> an arch can just pass NULL. If it supports  regs, then
> it can allow tools like kprobes to ask for regs. Otherwise the
> regs parameter should just be NULL.

Hmm, by default, will the ftrace_ops be also NULL? or NULL only if
the arch doesn't support passing ftrace ops?
I mean, should the generic handler always check if ftrace_ops
isn't NULL before using it?

> The second set is Masami's patches ported on top of these changes.
> 
> This is v2, and I've cleaned the patches up a bit and added a lot more
> comments. This is a more serious RFC as this is the current way I plan
> on pushing it to mainline. But I'm posting first in case someone spots
> something that I missed. I'll also be doing more testing on it and if
> someting comes up I'll obviously will fix it before pushing.
> 
> Some change since v1:
> 
>  Added fix for undefined ftrace_location() when compiling with !DYNAMIC_FTRACE.
>  
>  Added missing regs passed for x86_64 (segment regs, and r11).
> 
>  Saved flags for when regs are being saved. The cmp in the mcount trampoline
>  that checks if function tracing is disabled will save flags before
>  the compare, and restore flags before returning back to the function.

Nice! :) this is what I hope in previous thread.

>  Decided that passing partial regs is a bad idea. Either the arch should
>  pass all regs or NULL. Even though partial regs are saved for calling the
>  function, it does't make sense to give that to the callback. By making
>  regs be full pt_regs or NULL, then the callbacks can simply check if
>  regs is NULL and if it isn't it can do more functionality, but if it
>  is NULL then it just does limited work. Having 'partial regs' would just
>  complicate that for no good reason. If in the future we want partial regs,
>  we can add another flag to request it.

Agreed.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-13  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-12 22:43 [RFC][PATCH 00/13 v2] kprobes/ftrace: Making ftrace usable for kprobes Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/13 v2] ftrace: Pass ftrace_ops as third parameter to function trace callback Steven Rostedt
2012-06-15  3:02   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-08-21 14:58   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/13 v2] ftrace: Consolidate arch dependent functions with list function Steven Rostedt
2012-06-15  3:02   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-08-21 14:59   ` [tip:perf/core] ftrace: Consolidate arch dependent functions with 'list' function tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/13 v2] ftrace: Return pt_regs to function trace callback Steven Rostedt
2012-06-15  3:02   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-06-15  3:17     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/13 v2] ftrace/x86_32: Push ftrace_ops in as 3rd parameter to function tracer Steven Rostedt
2012-06-15  3:03   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-08-21 15:01   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/13 v2] ftrace/x86: Add separate function to save regs Steven Rostedt
2012-06-15  8:15   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-06-15 11:33     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-18  9:14       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/13 v2] ftrace/x86: Add save_regs for i386 function calls Steven Rostedt
2012-06-15  6:03   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-06-15 11:29     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/13 v2] ftrace: add ftrace_set_filter_ip() for address based filter Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/13 v2] kprobes: Inverse taking of module_mutex with kprobe_mutex Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/13 v2] kprobes: cleanup to separate probe-able check Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/13 v2] kprobes: Move locks into appropriate functions Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/13 v2] ftrace: Make ftrace_location() a nop on !DYNAMIC_FTRACE Steven Rostedt
2012-08-21 15:12   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/13 v2] kprobes: introduce ftrace based optimization Steven Rostedt
2012-06-12 22:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/13 v2] kprobes/x86: ftrace based optimization for x86 Steven Rostedt
2012-06-13  8:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2012-06-13 11:12   ` [RFC][PATCH 00/13 v2] kprobes/ftrace: Making ftrace usable for kprobes Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FD84E84.1090001@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).