From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030742AbXCMQTM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:19:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030754AbXCMQTM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:19:12 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:51464 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030742AbXCMQTK (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:19:10 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Qr+E577vztx/1i9xP74ByYJJOAtlnxxobER8RVrM+8tHeEzg+be+6yIOM47OqOgihIi7MUWQSV6a/YBwZN6KIVT8jxt4Oj0jSMdoBkHPaiaqWi2ELW9m3EgZq6RDd5FHB9yi40MYYDjK5pijAfE8RsdOj92LtsrRgGi1PfPlGwk= Message-ID: <4af2d03a0703130919nb4893b1ja9ec795dcf4bf53c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:19:04 +0100 From: "Jiri Slaby" To: "Dmitry Torokhov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: add sensable phantom driver Cc: "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "Greg KH" , "Anssi Hannula" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2460126662758025813@fi.muni.cz> <45EEEAA3.50009@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Anssi Hannula On 3/7/07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On 3/7/07, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > Dmitry Torokhov napsal(a): > > > Hi Jiri, > > > > Hi. > > > > > On 3/7/07, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > >> add sensable phantom driver > > > ... > > > > > > General question - can this driver use force-feedback mecahnisms > > > already present in kernel instead of exporting raw datastream to > > > userspace. What are shortcomings of kernels force-feedback > > > implemenattion that make it insufficient for phantom? > > > > I didn't even think about it, sorry. Does any problem with rate about 2kHz come > > on your mind before I'll try to rewrite it? > > No, not really. Hmm, after going through input and ff layer, I figured out, that it's possible to pass only a direction to constant effect. I think, there is no possibility to pass 3D force (or vector) to the ff layer, isn't it? thanks, -- http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/ Jiri Slaby faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint: B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8 22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E