From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F85C433EF for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 18:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350213AbiAKSwr (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:52:47 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:20707 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350196AbiAKSwp (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:52:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1641927165; x=1673463165; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Sua0LrwqqZdGAfIsKVCvbngimpLDy6yy/a/Faw9JSso=; b=U5+5cHThWF1WnuACgO++UtvT/QOUXtOShJcumMySq8LkURpxXjyZLXw/ D4TjY2VLpopg91KKhD9c8rPk9b33mkXhbtXfZmI+P5/Z9ajSLft1NSpbC /4W2si5LwSf0EhtdY2LYCu1rkqhh5kWhO9EAWaPlXd1LQDtfYLG3+zbb+ XmzFCsGUToj1reu1oTvqVfgT/OH6rJmgmt80GPvoTVGp2USA3BC5vkMSK DIE2bY0+Kdcp6/Q6CIrVRGy7ti9dJDhVGS7/msYBl7yrDzQZNaxRUe8AB r3MFiHvZP22xiWQBkE7X7xxmOHlrjRA+2djzEeSfpeE8GGj4R/pAgBm81 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10224"; a="224256273" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,279,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="224256273" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jan 2022 10:52:45 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,279,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="528400339" Received: from akleen-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.209.36.204]) ([10.209.36.204]) by fmsmga007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jan 2022 10:52:44 -0800 Message-ID: <4b655bf8-ce56-ffe6-78b6-1f949b8df11f@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:52:35 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] perf tools: Add 'm' event modifier for counting machine Content-Language: en-US To: Nikita Shubin Cc: Atish Patra , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux@yadro.com, Nikita Shubin , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Kajol Jain , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , Jin Yao , Ian Rogers , John Garry , Riccardo Mancini , Madhavan Srinivasan , Song Liu , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220111142054.18733-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> <20220111142054.18733-2-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> From: Andi Kleen In-Reply-To: <20220111142054.18733-2-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > u - user-space counting > k - kernel counting > + m - machine counting You really need to explain what "machine counting" actually is, as well that is likely irrelevant for most CPUs. I also didn't see that anywhere in the commit logs. -Andi