archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <>
To: linux-rt-users <>,
	LKML <>
Cc: "Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <>,
	"Valentin Schneider" <>,
	"Juri Lelli" <>,
	"Dhaval Giani" <>,
	"Clark Williams" <>,
	"Kate Stewart" <>,
	"Kate Carcia" <>,
	"Phil Auld" <>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <>,
	"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <>,
	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <>,
	"Tom Zanussi" <>,
	"Luis Claudio R. Gonçalves" <>,
	"John Kacur" <>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <>,
	"Vincent Guittot" <>,
	"Mark Brown" <>,
	"Dietmar Eggemann" <>,
	"Daniel Wagner" <>
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] CFP: Real-Time Microconference - Linux Plumbers Conference 2021
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:58:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

The Real-time microconference focuses on finishing the last lap of getting the
PREEMPT_RT[1] patch set into mainline. Many of these missing pieces, however, 
are not at the core of real-time features (like locking, and scheduling), but 
instead, on other subsystems that compose the kernel, like file systems and 
memory management. Making this Linux subsystems compatible with PREEMPT_RT 
requires finding a solution that is acceptable by subsystem maintainer, without 
having these subsystems suffer from performance or complexity issues.

Suggested Topics:
 - New tools for PREEMPT_RT analysis [2].
 - How do we teach the rest of the kernel developers how not to break
 - Stable maintainers tools discussion & improvements: [3]
 - The usage of PREEMPT_RT on safety-critical systems: what do we need to do?
 - Make NAPI and the kernel-rt working better together [5]
 - Migrate disable and the problems that they cause on rt tasks [6]
 - It is time to discuss the "BKL"-like style of our preempt/bh/irq_disable()
   synchronization functions.
 - How do we close the documentation gap
 - The status of the merge, and how can we resolve the last issues that block
   the merge
 - Invite the developers of the areas where patches are still under discussion 
   to help to find an agreement
 - How can we improve the testing of the -rt, to follow the problems raised as    
   Linus tree advances?
 - What’s next?

If you are interested in participating in this microconference and have topics 
to propose, please use the LPC CfP process, and select "Real-time MC" for the 
"Track". More topics will be added based on CfP for LPC microconference.

MC leads:
 - Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <>
 - Steven Rostedt <>
 - Clark Williams <>
 - Dhaval Giani <>
 - Kate Stewart <>

[5] Discussions:

                 reply	other threads:[~2021-07-23 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [ANNOUNCE] CFP: Real-Time Microconference - Linux Plumbers Conference 2021' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).