linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 13:44:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d8e3fd304122904442a602a8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1103977161.22646.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 12:19:24 +0000, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> On Gwe, 2004-12-24 at 22:39, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Ok, with a lot of people taking an xmas break, here's something to play
> > with over the holidays (not to mention an excuse for me to get into the
> > Glögg for real ;)
> 
> Merry Yule to you too.
> 
> Not wishing to be too ungrateful to Santa but
> 
> - The broken AX.25 patches are not reverted so that doesn't work on some
> networks
> 
> - It seems the security hole inducing exec_id change was not reverted
> and I've not yet found any other changes that fix the same problem
> (setuid_app >/proc/self/mem) in 2.6.10. It was actually quite nasty as a
> hole because you can seek the fd to the right target address before
> execing. With the other /proc changes did I miss something on this one
> 
> I'll check it all over in more detail when I generate 2.6.10-ac
> (probably tomorrow), which will be nice as the patch will be a _lot_
> shorter and USB storage a lot happier than 2.6.9 based systems.
> 

Having at least a -rc or maintaining a 2.6.XY.Z branch would avoid
these problems in my very humble opinion.

Best,

-- 
Paolo Ciarrocchi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-12-29 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-24 22:39 Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 Linus Torvalds
2004-12-25 11:11 ` Andrew Walrond
2004-12-25 12:19 ` Alan Cox
2004-12-26 11:30   ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-12-26 13:45     ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-12-26 19:37       ` Pavel Machek
2004-12-26 19:39       ` Pavel Machek
2004-12-26 20:27         ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-12-26 22:10           ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-13 18:09             ` 2.6.10-mm3: swsusp: out of memory on resume (was: Re: Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10) Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-13 19:59               ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-13 21:22                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-14 14:34               ` hugang
2005-01-14 17:25                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-15 21:43                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-16 21:51                     ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-17 14:53                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-17 15:22                         ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-18  1:44                         ` hugang
     [not found]                 ` <200501150042.35377.rjw@sisk.pl>
2005-01-15  1:21                   ` hugang
     [not found]                     ` <200501151147.32919.rjw@sisk.pl>
     [not found]                       ` <200501152220.42129.rjw@sisk.pl>
2005-01-16  5:54                         ` hugang
2005-01-16 10:07                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-16 14:46                             ` hugang
2005-01-17 15:48                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-01-17 16:49                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-12-30  9:58         ` Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-12-26 15:45   ` Alan Cox
2004-12-29 12:44   ` Paolo Ciarrocchi [this message]
2004-12-26  2:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-12-26  3:36   ` Linus Torvalds
     [not found]   ` <1104171962.18174.28.camel@d845pe>
2004-12-28 16:38     ` Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 (irq18) Bill Davidsen
2004-12-26  4:19 ` Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-12-26  5:12   ` [PATCH] parport_pc: don't mix module parameter styles Randy.Dunlap
2004-12-26 20:35 ` Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 Greg Norris
2004-12-27  1:31   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-12-28  2:36     ` Greg Norris
2004-12-27 16:10 ` Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 (compile stats) John Cherry
2004-12-28  1:04 ` Ho ho ho - Linux v2.6.10 Håkan Lindqvist
2004-12-26  4:10 Paul Blazejowski
2004-12-26  5:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-26 15:46   ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4d8e3fd304122904442a602a8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).