linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: "Shirley Her (SC)" <shirley.her@bayhubtech.com>,
	"ulf.hansson@linaro.org" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Chevron Li (WH)" <chevron.li@bayhubtech.com>,
	"Shaper Liu (WH)" <shaper.liu@bayhubtech.com>,
	"Louis Lu (TP)" <louis.lu@bayhubtech.com>,
	"Max Huang (SC)" <max.huang@bayhubtech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 3/3] mmc: sdhci-pci-o2micro: Fix O2 Host data read/write DLL Lock phase shift issue
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:37:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d926e9c-cb98-6587-f38d-426dd04d84de@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1566412784-6224-1-git-send-email-shirley.her@bayhubtech.com>

On 21/08/19 9:39 PM, Shirley Her (SC) wrote:
> Fix data read/write error in HS200 mode due to chip DLL lock phase shift
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shirley Her <shirley.her@bayhubtech.com>

2 comments below:

> ---
> change in V8:
>  1. fix patch format error
> 
> change in V7:
>  1. change subject
>  2. change the sdhci_o2_wait_dll_detect_lock_function
>  3. add suitable usleep_range() to detect dll lock status
> 
> change in V6:
>  1. define constant by using array size
>  2. add more explanation for the code
>  3. fix loop forever code error
> 
> change in V5:
>  1. split 2 patches into 3 patches
>  2. make dll_adjust_count start from 0
>  3. fix ret overwritten issue
>  4. use break instead of goto
> 
> change in V4:
>  1. add a bug fix for V3
> 
> change in V3:
>  1. add more explanation in dll_recovery and execute_tuning function
>  2. move dll_adjust_count to O2_host struct
>  3. fix some coding style error
>  4. renaming O2_PLL_WDT_CONTROL1 TO O2_PLL_DLL_WDT_CONTROL1
> 
> change in V2:
>  1. use usleep_range instead of udelay
>  2. move dll_adjust_count to sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> 
> chagne in V1:
>  1. add error recovery function to relock DLL with correct phase
>  2. retuning HS200 after DLL locked
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> index 57c8b83..d879d91 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>  #include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  
>  #include "sdhci.h"
>  #include "sdhci-pci.h"
> @@ -55,9 +56,18 @@
>  #define  O2_PLL_FORCE_ACTIVE	BIT(18)
>  #define  O2_PLL_LOCK_STATUS	BIT(14)
>  #define  O2_PLL_SOFT_RESET	BIT(12)
> +#define  O2_DLL_LOCK_STATUS	BIT(11)
>  
>  #define O2_SD_DETECT_SETTING 0x324
>  
> +static const u32 dmdn_table[] = {0x2B1C0000,
> +	0x2C1A0000, 0x371B0000, 0x35100000};
> +#define DMDN_SZ ARRAY_SIZE(dmdn_table)
> +
> +struct o2_host {
> +	u8 dll_adjust_count;
> +};
> +
>  static void sdhci_o2_wait_card_detect_stable(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  {
>  	ktime_t timeout;
> @@ -133,7 +143,8 @@ static int sdhci_o2_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>  
> -	sdhci_o2_enable_internal_clock(host);
> +	if (!(sdhci_readw(host, O2_PLL_DLL_WDT_CONTROL1) & O2_PLL_LOCK_STATUS))
> +		sdhci_o2_enable_internal_clock(host);
>  
>  	return !!(sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE) & SDHCI_CARD_PRESENT);
>  }
> @@ -152,6 +163,25 @@ static void o2_pci_set_baseclk(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip, u32 value)
>  			       O2_SD_PLL_SETTING, scratch_32);
>  }
>  
> +static u32 sdhci_o2_pll_dll_wdt_control(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +	return sdhci_readl(host, O2_PLL_DLL_WDT_CONTROL1);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function is used to detect dll lock status.
> + * Since the dll lock status bit will toggle randomly
> + * with very short interval which needs to be polled
> + * as fast as possible. Set sleep_us as 1 microsecond.
> + */
> +static int sdhci_o2_wait_dll_detect_lock(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +	u32	scratch32 = 0;
> +
> +	return readx_poll_timeout(sdhci_o2_pll_dll_wdt_control, host,
> +		scratch32, !(scratch32 & O2_DLL_LOCK_STATUS), 1, 1000000);
> +}
> +
>  static void sdhci_o2_set_tuning_mode(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  {
>  	u16 reg;
> @@ -189,6 +219,83 @@ static void __sdhci_o2_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
>  	sdhci_reset_tuning(host);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * This function is used to fix o2 dll shift issue.
> + * It isn't necessary to detect card present before recovery.
> + * Firstly, it is used by bht emmc card, which is embedded.
> + * Second, before call recovery card present will be detected
> + * outside of the execute tuning function.
> + */
> +static int sdhci_o2_dll_recovery(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	u8 scratch_8 = 0;
> +	u32 scratch_32 = 0;
> +	struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
> +	struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip = slot->chip;
> +	struct o2_host *o2_host = sdhci_pci_priv(slot);
> +
> +	/* UnLock WP */
> +	pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev,
> +			O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch_8);
> +	scratch_8 &= 0x7f;
> +	pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch_8);
> +	while (o2_host->dll_adjust_count < DMDN_SZ && !ret) {
> +		/* Disable clock */
> +		sdhci_writeb(host, 0, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +
> +		/* PLL software reset */
> +		scratch_32 = sdhci_readl(host, O2_PLL_DLL_WDT_CONTROL1);
> +		scratch_32 |= O2_PLL_SOFT_RESET;
> +		sdhci_writel(host, scratch_32, O2_PLL_DLL_WDT_CONTROL1);
> +
> +		pci_read_config_dword(chip->pdev,
> +					    O2_SD_FUNC_REG4,
> +					    &scratch_32);
> +		/* Enable Base Clk setting change */
> +		scratch_32 |= O2_SD_FREG4_ENABLE_CLK_SET;
> +		pci_write_config_dword(chip->pdev, O2_SD_FUNC_REG4, scratch_32);
> +		o2_pci_set_baseclk(chip, dmdn_table[o2_host->dll_adjust_count]);
> +
> +		/* Enable internal clock */
> +		scratch_8 = SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_EN;
> +		sdhci_writeb(host, scratch_8, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +
> +		if (sdhci_o2_get_cd(host->mmc)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * need wait at least 5ms for dll status stable,
> +			 * after enable internal clock
> +			 */
> +			usleep_range(5000, 6000);
> +			if (sdhci_o2_wait_dll_detect_lock(host)) {
> +				scratch_8 |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
> +				sdhci_writeb(host, scratch_8,
> +					SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +				ret = 1;
> +			} else {
> +				pr_warn("%s: DLL unlocked when dll_adjust_count is %d.\n",
> +					mmc_hostname(host->mmc),
> +					o2_host->dll_adjust_count);
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			pr_err("%s: card present detect failed.\n",
> +				mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		o2_host->dll_adjust_count++;
> +	}
> +	if (!ret && o2_host->dll_adjust_count == DMDN_SZ)

As I wrote in reply to V7, isn't this off by 1? i.e. should be
o2_host->dll_adjust_count > DMDN_SZ

> +		pr_err("%s: DLL adjust over max times\n",
> +		mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
> +	/* Lock WP */
> +	pci_read_config_byte(chip->pdev,
> +				   O2_SD_LOCK_WP, &scratch_8);
> +	scratch_8 |= 0x80;
> +	pci_write_config_byte(chip->pdev, O2_SD_LOCK_WP, scratch_8);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int sdhci_o2_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> @@ -203,7 +310,16 @@ static int sdhci_o2_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON(opcode != MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -
> +	/*
> +	 * Judge the tuning reason, whether caused by dll shift
> +	 * If cause by dll shift, should call sdhci_o2_dll_recovery
> +	 */
> +	if (!sdhci_o2_wait_dll_detect_lock(host))
> +		if (!sdhci_o2_dll_recovery(host)) {
> +			pr_err("%s: o2 dll recovery failed\n",
> +				mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
>  	/*
>  	 * o2 sdhci host didn't support 8bit emmc tuning
>  	 */
> @@ -371,6 +487,7 @@ static void sdhci_o2_enable_clk(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 clk)
>  	clk |= SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_EN;
>  	sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
>  
> +	sdhci_o2_enable_internal_clock(host);
>  	if (sdhci_o2_get_cd(host->mmc)) {
>  		clk |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
>  		sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> @@ -396,12 +513,14 @@ int sdhci_pci_o2_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
>  {
>  	struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip;
>  	struct sdhci_host *host;
> +	struct o2_host *o2_host = sdhci_pci_priv(slot);
>  	u32 reg, caps;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	chip = slot->chip;
>  	host = slot->host;
>  
> +	o2_host->dll_adjust_count = 0;

As I wrote in reply to V7, please remove trailing white space after
"o2_host->dll_adjust_count = 0;"

>  	caps = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CAPABILITIES);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -688,4 +807,5 @@ const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_o2 = {
>  	.resume = sdhci_pci_o2_resume,
>  #endif
>  	.ops = &sdhci_pci_o2_ops,
> +	.priv_size = sizeof(struct o2_host),
>  };
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-28  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-21 18:39 [PATCH V8 3/3] mmc: sdhci-pci-o2micro: Fix O2 Host data read/write DLL Lock phase shift issue Shirley Her (SC)
2019-08-28  8:37 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2019-08-28 17:10   ` Shirley Her (SC)
2019-08-29 12:54     ` Adrian Hunter
2019-08-29 12:53 ` Adrian Hunter
2019-09-04  9:53 ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4d926e9c-cb98-6587-f38d-426dd04d84de@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=chevron.li@bayhubtech.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=louis.lu@bayhubtech.com \
    --cc=max.huang@bayhubtech.com \
    --cc=shaper.liu@bayhubtech.com \
    --cc=shirley.her@bayhubtech.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).