From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>,
"open list:BROADCOM ETHERNET PHY DRIVERS"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
michael@walle.cc
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: phy: broadcom: Allow BCM54210E to configure APD
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 20:29:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e1c1a4c-d276-c850-8e97-16ef1f08dcff@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210213104245.uti4qb2u2r5nblef@skbuf>
On 2/13/2021 2:42 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 07:46:32PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> BCM54210E/BCM50212E has been verified to work correctly with the
>> auto-power down configuration done by bcm54xx_adjust_rxrefclk(), add it
>> to the list of PHYs working.
>>
>> While we are at it, provide an appropriate name for the bit we are
>> changing which disables the RXC and TXC during auto-power down when
>> there is no energy on the cable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>> ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
>
>> drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c | 8 +++++---
>> include/linux/brcmphy.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c b/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>> index 3ce266ab521b..91fbd26c809e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>> @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ static void bcm54xx_adjust_rxrefclk(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> if (BRCM_PHY_MODEL(phydev) != PHY_ID_BCM57780 &&
>> BRCM_PHY_MODEL(phydev) != PHY_ID_BCM50610 &&
>> BRCM_PHY_MODEL(phydev) != PHY_ID_BCM50610M &&
>> + BRCM_PHY_MODEL(phydev) != PHY_ID_BCM54210E &&
>> BRCM_PHY_MODEL(phydev) != PHY_ID_BCM54810 &&
>> BRCM_PHY_MODEL(phydev) != PHY_ID_BCM54811)
>> return;
>> @@ -227,9 +228,10 @@ static void bcm54xx_adjust_rxrefclk(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> val |= BCM54XX_SHD_SCR3_DLLAPD_DIS;
>>
>> if (phydev->dev_flags & PHY_BRCM_DIS_TXCRXC_NOENRGY) {
>> - if (BRCM_PHY_MODEL(phydev) == PHY_ID_BCM54810 ||
>> - BRCM_PHY_MODEL(phydev) == PHY_ID_BCM54811)
>> - val |= BCM54810_SHD_SCR3_TRDDAPD;
>> + if (BRCM_PHY_MODEL(phydev) == PHY_ID_BCM54210E ||
>> + BRCM_PHY_MODEL(phydev) == PHY_ID_BCM54810 ||
>> + BRCM_PHY_MODEL(phydev) == PHY_ID_BCM54210E)
>> + val |= BCM54XX_SHD_SCR3_RXCTXC_DIS;
>> else
>> val |= BCM54XX_SHD_SCR3_TRDDAPD;
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/brcmphy.h b/include/linux/brcmphy.h
>> index 844dcfe789a2..16597d3fa011 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/brcmphy.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/brcmphy.h
>> @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@
>> #define BCM54XX_SHD_SCR3_DEF_CLK125 0x0001
>> #define BCM54XX_SHD_SCR3_DLLAPD_DIS 0x0002
>> #define BCM54XX_SHD_SCR3_TRDDAPD 0x0004
>> +#define BCM54XX_SHD_SCR3_RXCTXC_DIS 0x0100
>
> Curiously enough, my BCM5464R datasheet does say:
>
> The TXC and RXC outputs can be disabled during auto-power down by setting the “1000BASE-T/100BASE-TX/10BASE-T
> Spare Control 3 Register (Address 1Ch, Shadow Value 00101),” bit 8 =1.
>
> but when I go to the definition of the register, bit 8 is hidden. Odd.
>
> How can I ensure that the auto power down feature is doing something?
I am trying to confirm what the expected power levels should be from the
54210E product engineer so I can give you an estimate of what you should
see with and without while measure the PHY's regulators.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-15 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-13 3:46 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: phy: broadcom: Cleanups and APD Florian Fainelli
2021-02-13 3:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: phy: broadcom: Avoid forward for bcm54xx_config_clock_delay() Florian Fainelli
2021-02-13 10:31 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-13 3:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: phy: broadcom: Remove unused flags Florian Fainelli
2021-02-13 10:33 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-13 3:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: phy: broadcom: Allow BCM54210E to configure APD Florian Fainelli
2021-02-13 10:42 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-15 4:29 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2021-03-03 3:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-03-05 1:08 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-06 4:26 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-02-15 23:20 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: phy: broadcom: Cleanups and APD patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e1c1a4c-d276-c850-8e97-16ef1f08dcff@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).