From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA26C433B4 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 13:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF1860FE7 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 13:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1353672AbhESN2G (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2021 09:28:06 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:38642 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239739AbhESN2D (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2021 09:28:03 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799E731B; Wed, 19 May 2021 06:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.179] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1AF63F73B; Wed, 19 May 2021 06:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 6/8] arm64: kvm: Expose KVM_ARM_CAP_MTE To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin , Mark Rutland , Thomas Gleixner , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Richard Henderson , Peter Maydell , Haibo Xu , Andrew Jones References: <20210517123239.8025-1-steven.price@arm.com> <20210517123239.8025-7-steven.price@arm.com> <87tun1tg1l.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Steven Price Message-ID: <4e1fc7b7-ea8c-a87c-9177-d9e03ff96cb8@arm.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 14:26:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87tun1tg1l.wl-maz@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 17/05/2021 18:40, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2021 13:32:37 +0100, > Steven Price wrote: >> >> It's now safe for the VMM to enable MTE in a guest, so expose the >> capability to user space. >> >> Signed-off-by: Steven Price >> --- >> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 9 +++++++++ >> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 3 +++ >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c >> index 1cb39c0803a4..e89a5e275e25 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c >> @@ -93,6 +93,12 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, >> r = 0; >> kvm->arch.return_nisv_io_abort_to_user = true; >> break; >> + case KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE: >> + if (!system_supports_mte() || kvm->created_vcpus) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + r = 0; >> + kvm->arch.mte_enabled = true; > > As far as I can tell from the architecture, this isn't valid for a > 32bit guest. Indeed, however the MTE flag is a property of the VM not of the vCPU. And, unless I'm mistaken, it's technically possible to create a VM where some CPUs are 32 bit and some 64 bit. Not that I can see much use of a configuration like that. Steve