linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, adobriyan@gmail.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4 v2] Define killable version for access_remote_vm() and use it in fs/proc
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:25:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ec32e5b-af63-f412-2213-e52bdbcc9585@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802261656490.16999@chino.kir.corp.google.com>



On 2/26/18 5:02 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Yang Shi wrote:
>
>> Background:
>> When running vm-scalability with large memory (> 300GB), the below hung
>> task issue happens occasionally.
>>
>> INFO: task ps:14018 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>>         Tainted: G            E 4.9.79-009.ali3000.alios7.x86_64 #1
>>   "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>>   ps              D    0 14018      1 0x00000004
>>    ffff885582f84000 ffff885e8682f000 ffff880972943000 ffff885ebf499bc0
>>    ffff8828ee120000 ffffc900349bfca8 ffffffff817154d0 0000000000000040
>>    00ffffff812f872a ffff885ebf499bc0 024000d000948300 ffff880972943000
>>   Call Trace:
>>    [<ffffffff817154d0>] ? __schedule+0x250/0x730
>>    [<ffffffff817159e6>] schedule+0x36/0x80
>>    [<ffffffff81718560>] rwsem_down_read_failed+0xf0/0x150
>>    [<ffffffff81390a28>] call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x18/0x30
>>    [<ffffffff81717db0>] down_read+0x20/0x40
>>    [<ffffffff812b9439>] proc_pid_cmdline_read+0xd9/0x4e0
>>    [<ffffffff81253c95>] ? do_filp_open+0xa5/0x100
>>    [<ffffffff81241d87>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x150
>>    [<ffffffff812f824b>] ? security_file_permission+0x9b/0xc0
>>    [<ffffffff81242266>] vfs_read+0x96/0x130
>>    [<ffffffff812437b5>] SyS_read+0x55/0xc0
>>    [<ffffffff8171a6da>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xc5
>>
>> When manipulating a large mapping, the process may hold the mmap_sem for
>> long time, so reading /proc/<pid>/cmdline may be blocked in
>> uninterruptible state for long time.
>> We already have killable version APIs for semaphore, here use down_read_killable()
>> to improve the responsiveness.
>>
> Rather than killable, we have patches that introduce down_read_unfair()
> variants for the files you've modified (cmdline and environ) as well as
> others (maps, numa_maps, smaps).

You mean you have such functionality used by google internally?

>
> When another thread is holding down_read() and there are queued
> down_write()'s, down_read_unfair() allows for grabbing the rwsem without
> queueing for it.  Additionally, when another thread is holding
> down_write(), down_read_unfair() allows for queueing in front of other
> threads trying to grab it for write as well.

It sounds the __unfair variant make the caller have chance to jump the 
gun to grab the semaphore before other waiters, right? But when a 
process holds the semaphore, i.e. mmap_sem, for a long time, it still 
has to sleep in uninterruptible state, right?

But, it seems __unfair variant may not be very helpful in this usecase. 
Reading /proc might be not that important to require any special care to 
grab the semaphore before other waiters. I just hope it doesn't sleep in 
uninterruptible state for a long time. If the user is not patient enough 
due to some reason, they can have a chance to abort.

>
> Ingo would know more about whether a variant like that in upstream Linux
> would be acceptable.
>
> Would you be interested in unfair variants instead of only addressing
> killable?

Yes, I'm although it still looks overkilling to me for reading /proc.

Thanks,
Yang

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-27  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-27  0:25 [RFC PATCH 0/4 v2] Define killable version for access_remote_vm() and use it in fs/proc Yang Shi
2018-02-27  0:25 ` [PATCH 1/4 v2] mm: add access_remote_vm_killable APIs Yang Shi
2018-02-27  0:25 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] fs: proc: use down_read_killable in proc_pid_cmdline_read() Yang Shi
2018-02-27  0:25 ` [PATCH 3/4 v2] fs: proc: use down_read_killable() in environ_read() Yang Shi
2018-02-27  7:15   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2018-02-27 16:59     ` Yang Shi
2018-02-27  0:25 ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] mm: use access_remote_vm() in get_cmdline() Yang Shi
2018-02-27  1:02 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4 v2] Define killable version for access_remote_vm() and use it in fs/proc David Rientjes
2018-02-27  1:25   ` Yang Shi [this message]
2018-02-27  1:47     ` David Rientjes
2018-03-01  0:17       ` Yang Shi
2018-03-06 18:45 ` Yang Shi
2018-03-06 20:45 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-06 21:17   ` Yang Shi
2018-03-06 21:41     ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-07  0:47       ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ec32e5b-af63-f412-2213-e52bdbcc9585@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).