From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272725AbTG1H4f (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 03:56:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272726AbTG1H4f (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 03:56:35 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:15594 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S272725AbTG1H4c (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 03:56:32 -0400 Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20030728100955.01bf5410@pop.gmx.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:15:55 +0200 To: Ingo Molnar From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [patch] sched-2.6.0-test1-G6, interactivity changes Cc: Con Kolivas , Felipe Alfaro Solana , LKML In-Reply-To: References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030728093215.01be8f68@pop.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 09:44 AM 7/28/2003 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > >Yes I can reproduce it, but we need the Kirk approach and cheat. Some > > >workaround for tasks that have fallen onto the expired array but > shouldn't be > > >there needs to be created. But first we need to think of one before we can > > >create one... > > > > Oh good, it's not my poor little box. My experimental tree already has > > a "Kirk" ;-) > >could you give -G7 a try: > > redhat.com/~mingo/O(1)-scheduler/sched-2.6.0-test1-G7 The dd case is improved. The dd if=/dev/zero is now prio 25, but it's of=/dev/null partner remains at 16. No change with the xmms gl thread. -Mike