From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754630Ab2GXOBo (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:01:44 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:56697 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753076Ab2GXOBn (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:01:43 -0400 Message-ID: <500EAAC2.2020802@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 08:01:38 -0600 From: David Ahern User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Frederic Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra , Robert Richter Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] perf top: error handling for counter creation should parallel perf-record References: <1342826756-64663-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> <1342826756-64663-10-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> <20120723181521.GD6717@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120723181521.GD6717@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/23/12 12:15 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:25:54PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu: >> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c >> index e3cab5f..0ce665c 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c >> @@ -943,8 +943,10 @@ try_again: >> * based cpu-clock-tick sw counter, which >> * is always available even if no PMU support: >> */ >> - if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE && >> - attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) { >> + if ((err == ENOENT || err == ENXIO) >> + && attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE >> + && attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) { >> + > > usual style: > > if ((err == ENOENT || err == ENXIO) && > attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE && > attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) { > Right. I literally made it the same as builtin-record.c. I'll resubmit. David