From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754294Ab2HGQdG (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:33:06 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:48655 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751523Ab2HGQdE (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:33:04 -0400 Message-ID: <5021432F.2030907@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:32:47 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com CC: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Feng Jin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Parallelize mtrr init between cpus References: <5020C3D7.2070407@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <5020C3D7.2070407@oracle.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/07/2012 12:29 AM, zhenzhong.duan wrote: > Current code serialize mtrr init with set_atomicity_lock. > Mtrr init is quite slow when we bootup on a hvm with large mem, vcpus > and pci passthroughed devices(eg. 24 vcpus + 90G mem). > It took about ~30 mins to bootup, after patch, it took ~2 min. When you're saying "HVM" do you mean "Xen HVM"? How does it behave on native hardware? -hpa