From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755075Ab2HNHcw (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 03:32:52 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:32910 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752428Ab2HNHcm (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 03:32:42 -0400 Message-ID: <5029FF15.4030903@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:32:37 +0400 From: Denis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Hemminger CC: Pablo Neira Ayuso , Patrick McHardy , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ldv-project@ispras.ru Subject: Re: [PATCH] [NETFILTER] bridge: rcu_deref outside read-lock section References: <1344898062-23633-1-git-send-email-yefremov.denis@gmail.com> <20120813163641.69a8388a@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> In-Reply-To: <20120813163641.69a8388a@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14.08.2012 3:36, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Why not just move the rcu_read_lock() in br_dev_xmit earlier? I don't know the semantics of this code, so it's difficult for me to choose the appropriate place. I thought that the callers of br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge_slow function are limited to br_dev_xmit and we can modify header without problems. Anyway, I will send another version of the patch.