From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: "khali@linux-fr.org" <khali@linux-fr.org>,
"ben-linux@fluff.org" <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
"w.sang@pengutronix.de" <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: tegra: dynamically control fast clk
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:15:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <502E914A.1030906@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502E9051.4090507@wwwdotorg.org>
On Saturday 18 August 2012 12:11 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:48 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> Tegra I2C driver enables the fast clock during initialization
>> and does not disable till driver removed.
>> Enable this clock before transfer and disable after transfer done.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> This patch is on top of the clock chnages which is in Tegra sub system and
>> based on
>> i2c: tegra: I2_M_NOSTART functionality not supported in Tegra20
>> So recommend to go on tegra sub-system.
> What exactly is this patch based on? I checked out Tegra's
> for-3.7/drivers-i2c, cherry-picked the M_NOSTART patch you mentioned,
> and attempted to apply this patch. It doesn't apply. Same if I don't
> cherry-pick the M_NOSTART patch, and same for next-20120816 with/without
> the M_NOSTART patch.
Then It seems I need to create the patch again and send it. The
M_NOSTART patch was on tot before clock related change and that is the
reason it is not applying.
Should I re-send these two patches together as 1/2 and 2/2 to maintain
sequence?
I can create based on your clock tree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-17 7:48 [PATCH] i2c: tegra: dynamically control fast clk Laxman Dewangan
2012-08-17 18:41 ` Stephen Warren
2012-08-17 18:45 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2012-08-17 19:07 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=502E914A.1030906@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).