From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755782Ab2HTH5Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 03:57:16 -0400 Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.141]:46559 "EHLO ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755620Ab2HTH5O (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 03:57:14 -0400 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Message-ID: <5031EDD7.1050404@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:57:11 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn Guo CC: Marek Vasut , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IIO: arm: Add LRADC to i.MX28 dts References: <1344784918-32352-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <201208170457.03686.marex@denx.de> <201208191730.31969.marex@denx.de> <5031E753.5070200@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> <20120820075249.GJ24242@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> In-Reply-To: <20120820075249.GJ24242@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20/08/12 08:52, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:29:23AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> Mostly these prefixes are an excuse for grumpy maintainers to moan >> at people :) > > Yeah, I have to become grumpy when my comment gets ignored and I have > to make it right (for several times) to avoid my upstream moaning at me. Not at all. My upstream has never moaned at me about it, but I still like to moan about it myself ;) > > Is it so hard? You are not creating a new subsystem but just patching > an existing file. A "git log" on the file simply shows you how to do it > Indeed. A file listing these would be add just one more piece of largely pointless horrendous documentation. Perhaps if Marek feels particularly strongly about this, proposing an additional line to for the SubmittingPatches document to say get your title format by looking at the log for what you are patching will do the job? (I can't immediately spot anything equivalent in there...)