From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030198Ab2HVXyd (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:54:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:40183 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932149Ab2HVXya (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:54:30 -0400 Message-ID: <50357127.1000608@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:54:15 +1000 From: Ryan Mallon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Sasha Levin , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, davem@davemloft.net, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@elte.hu, ebiederm@xmission.com, aarcange@redhat.com, ericvh@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, ccaulfie@redhat.com, teigland@redhat.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, bfields@fieldses.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jesse@nicira.com, venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com, ejt@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, lw@cn.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/17] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable References: <1345602432-27673-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <1345602432-27673-2-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <20120822180138.GA19212@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20120822180138.GA19212@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/08/12 04:01, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Sasha. > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:26:56AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: >> +#define DEFINE_HASHTABLE(name, bits) \ >> + struct hlist_head name[HASH_SIZE(bits)]; > > Shouldn't this be something like the following? > > #define DEFINE_HASHTABLE(name, bits) \ > struct hlist_head name[HASH_SIZE(bits)] = \ > { [0 ... HASH_SIZE(bits) - 1] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT }; > > Also, given that the declaration isn't non-trivial, you'll probably > want a matching DECLARE_HASHTABLE() macro too. > >> +/* Use hash_32 when possible to allow for fast 32bit hashing in 64bit kernels. */ >> +#define hash_min(val, bits) ((sizeof(val)==4) ? hash_32((val), (bits)) : hash_long((val), (bits))) > > Why is the branching condition sizeof(val) == 4 instead of <= 4? > Also, no biggie but why isn't this macro in caps? It should probably use gcc's statement expression extensions to prevent side-effect issues with the arguments: #define hash_min ({ \ sizeof(val) <= 4 ? \ hash_32(val, bits) : \ hash_long(val, bits)); \ }) ~Ryan