From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
<michael.thalmeier@hale.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 0/2] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.41-rt62-rc1 stable review
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:54:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503BFAB8.4070708@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120825034900.144648579@goodmis.org>
On 08/24/12 20:49, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Dear RT Folks,
>
> This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.0.41-rt62-rc1.
>
> Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
I should have looked harder when Michael requested my patch be applied to the
stable series.
My patch was part of a two patch series, sent 5/16. The first patch was
a reversal of preempt-rt-allow-immediate-magic-sysrq-output-for-preempt_rt_full.patch
The second patch works fine without the first patch. But the second patch (the one
in 3.0.41-rt62-rc1) removes the need for
preempt-rt-allow-immediate-magic-sysrq-output-for-preempt_rt_full.patch
It is not a big deal if the reversal patch gets left out of the stable releases,
but it is cleaner if it is included.
This also applies to 3.2.28-rt42-rc1
< snip >
> Changes from 3.0.41-rt61:
>
> ---
>
>
> Frank Rowand (1):
> fix printk flush of messages
>
> Steven Rostedt (1):
> Linux 3.0.41-rt62-rc1
>
> ----
> kernel/printk.c | 2 +-
> localversion-rt | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-Frank
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-27 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-25 3:49 [PATCH RT 0/2] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.41-rt62-rc1 stable review Steven Rostedt
2012-08-25 3:49 ` [PATCH RT 1/2] fix printk flush of messages Steven Rostedt
2012-08-25 3:49 ` [PATCH RT 2/2] Linux 3.0.41-rt62-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2012-08-27 8:15 ` [PATCH RT 0/2] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.41-rt62-rc1 stable review Michael Thalmeier
2012-08-27 22:54 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503BFAB8.4070708@am.sony.com \
--to=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.thalmeier@hale.at \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).