From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752411Ab2H1LEd (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:04:33 -0400 Received: from mail-gg0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:60813 "EHLO mail-gg0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751484Ab2H1LEc (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:04:32 -0400 Message-ID: <503CA5BA.2040003@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:04:26 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: axboe@kernel.dk CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sg_io: allow UNMAP and WRITE SAME without CAP_SYS_RAWIO References: <1342801801-15617-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <50195108.1090105@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <50195108.1090105@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 01/08/2012 17:53, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto: > Il 20/07/2012 18:30, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto: >> These commands cannot be issued right now without giving CAP_SYS_RAWIO to >> the process who wishes to send them. These commands can be useful also to >> non-privileged programs who have access to the block devices. For example >> a virtual machine monitor needs them to forward trim/discard to host disks. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini >> --- >> block/scsi_ioctl.c | 3 ++ >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/block/scsi_ioctl.c >> index 260fa80..dd71f18 100644 >> --- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c >> +++ b/block/scsi_ioctl.c >> @@ -168,13 +168,16 @@ static void blk_set_cmd_filter_defaults(struct blk_cmd_filter *filter) >> /* Basic writing commands */ >> __set_bit(WRITE_6, filter->write_ok); >> __set_bit(WRITE_10, filter->write_ok); >> + __set_bit(WRITE_SAME, filter->write_ok); >> __set_bit(WRITE_VERIFY, filter->write_ok); >> __set_bit(WRITE_12, filter->write_ok); >> __set_bit(WRITE_VERIFY_12, filter->write_ok); >> __set_bit(WRITE_16, filter->write_ok); >> + __set_bit(WRITE_SAME_16, filter->write_ok); >> __set_bit(WRITE_LONG, filter->write_ok); >> __set_bit(WRITE_LONG_2, filter->write_ok); >> __set_bit(ERASE, filter->write_ok); >> + __set_bit(UNMAP, filter->write_ok); >> __set_bit(GPCMD_MODE_SELECT_10, filter->write_ok); >> __set_bit(MODE_SELECT, filter->write_ok); >> __set_bit(LOG_SELECT, filter->write_ok); >> > > Jens, > > can this go in 3.6 as well? Another ping... Paolo