linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dirk.brandewie@gmail.com,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, jbaron@redhat.com,
	ben-linux@fluff.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: i2c-designware-core: KBUILD_MODNAME undeclared [was: Build regressions/improvements in v3.6-rc1]
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:18:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5040B98A.8090304@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120831144429.554345d0@endymion.delvare>

On 08/31/2012 02:44 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Jiri, Geert,
> 
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:01:38 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 08/04/2012 11:24 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in
>>> v3.6-rc1[1] compared to v3.5[2].
>> ...
>>>   + drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c: error: 'KBUILD_MODNAME' undeclared (first use in this function):
>>
>> This is a real problem we are facing here. It happens on PPC when all
>> I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM, I2C_DESIGNWARE_PCI and DYNAMIC_DEBUG are set.
>>
>> It's because i2c-designware-core.c is used in two modules
>> (i2c-designware-platform and i2c-designware-pci) and KBUILD_MODNAME is
>> not defined for those because (scripts/Makefile.lib):
>> # $(modname_flags) #defines KBUILD_MODNAME as the name of the module
>> # it will end up in (or would, if it gets compiled in)
>> # Note: Files that end up in two or more modules are compiled
>> #       without the KBUILD_MODNAME definition. The reason is
>> #       that any made-up name would differ in different configs.
>>
>> But DYNAMIC_DEBUG needs KBUILD_MODNAME for dev_dbg used in that source.
>>
>> Any ideas? Why is it not a separate module for example?
> 
> It should be. Axel Lin has posted a patch which does that and it should
> fix your problem:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/13/233
> 
> Please test and confirm it does the right thing. I'll push the patch
> upstream if it does.

Yes, it does.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs

      reply	other threads:[~2012-08-31 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-04  9:24 Build regressions/improvements in v3.6-rc1 Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-08-15 20:01 ` i2c-designware-core: KBUILD_MODNAME undeclared [was: Build regressions/improvements in v3.6-rc1] Jiri Slaby
2012-08-31 12:44   ` Jean Delvare
2012-08-31 13:18     ` Jiri Slaby [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5040B98A.8090304@suse.cz \
    --to=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=dirk.brandewie@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).