From: Cruz Julian Bishop <cruzjbishop@gmail.com>
To: Cruz Julian Bishop <cruzjbishop@gmail.com>
Cc: mcgrof@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] scripts/checkpatch.pl: A small step for Linux...
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:23:01 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5040BAB5.6000503@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346419090-3808-1-git-send-email-cruzjbishop@gmail.com>
Ah, the wonders of having no coffee. I only just realized that
I wrote checkpatch instead of checkincludes!
Should I resubmit this patch series, or just leave it since it's
already on the mailing list?
On 31/08/12 23:18, Cruz Julian Bishop wrote:
> ...and a big step for learning more Perl.
>
> Hi!
>
> This patch set started off as an experiment, but as I continued, I
> realised that I should submit this and see if it's suitable for merging
> into Linux.
>
> To start off with, here's some patches for checkincludes.pl
>
> This set was created for the following purposes:
>
> 1: Making it slightly easier to read
> 2: Making it easier to extend and add new arguments
> 3: Changing the usage output to look more "correct"
> 4: Introducing a 'quiet' mode like checkpatch.pl, and printing
> messages for files without duplicated includes by default
>
> Sorry if I did anything wrong - It's my first time really
> experimenting with Perl.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> ~Cruz
>
> Cruz Julian Bishop (4):
> scripts/checkincludes.pl: Print usage with heredoc
> scripts/checkincludes.pl: Simplify and shorten argument logic
> scripts/checkincludes.pl: Fix a bug introduced in the last commit
> scripts/checkincludes.pl: Introduce 'quiet' mode
>
> scripts/checkincludes.pl | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-31 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-31 13:18 [PATCH 0/4] scripts/checkpatch.pl: A small step for Linux Cruz Julian Bishop
2012-08-31 13:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] scripts/checkincludes.pl: Print usage with heredoc Cruz Julian Bishop
2012-08-31 13:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] scripts/checkincludes.pl: Simplify and shorten argument logic Cruz Julian Bishop
2012-08-31 15:42 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-31 21:54 ` Cruz Julian Bishop
2012-08-31 13:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] scripts/checkincludes.pl: Fix a bug introduced in the last commit Cruz Julian Bishop
2012-08-31 13:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] scripts/checkincludes.pl: Introduce 'quiet' mode Cruz Julian Bishop
2012-08-31 13:23 ` Cruz Julian Bishop [this message]
2012-08-31 18:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] scripts/checkpatch.pl: A small step for Linux Jesper Juhl
2012-08-31 21:55 ` Cruz Julian Bishop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5040BAB5.6000503@gmail.com \
--to=cruzjbishop@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).