From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759142Ab2IFQ01 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:26:27 -0400 Received: from oproxy11-pub.bluehost.com ([173.254.64.10]:36534 "HELO oproxy11-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758953Ab2IFQ0Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:26:25 -0400 Message-ID: <5048C474.5040609@xenotime.net> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 08:42:44 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110323 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt CC: Cong Wang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add feature-removal-schedule.txt removal to feature-removal-schedule.txt References: <1346091725.19381.10.camel@pippen.local.home> <1346773188.27919.13.camel@gandalf.local.home> <1346942563.1680.19.camel@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1346942563.1680.19.camel@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1807:box742.bluehost.com:xenotime:xenotime.net} {sentby:smtp auth 50.53.38.135 authed with rdunlap@xenotime.net} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/06/2012 07:42 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 22:29 +0800, Cong Wang wrote: > >> I don't think feature-removal-schedule.txt is for kernel users, it >> is a kind of a TODO list for kernel developers. > > And this is exactly what Linus was complaining about. It shouldn't be > used as a TODO list for developers. Were there some better alternatives discussed? -- ~Randy