linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] ACPI/pci-bind: remove bind/unbind callbacks from acpi_device_ops
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:31:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5057343C.2010201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQWk_2gPyVUiLgvRQ=qrFNby_R7Qh-QNruobQnhVFTn21w@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/16/2012 07:27 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>>
>> Now ACPI devices are created before/destroyed after corresponding PCI
>> devices, and acpi_platform_notify/acpi_platform_notify_remove will
>> update PCI<->ACPI binding relationship when creating/destroying PCI
>> devices, there's no need to invoke bind/unbind callbacks from ACPI
>> device probe/destroy routines anymore. So remove bind/unbind callbacks
>> from acpi_device_ops.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c     |  100 +++++++++----------------------------------
>>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c     |    9 ----
>>  drivers/acpi/scan.c         |   21 +--------
>>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h     |    4 --
>>  include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |    1 -
>>  5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> index d1ecca2..f31cb2f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> @@ -1232,17 +1232,8 @@ static int acpi_bus_remove(struct acpi_device *dev, int rmdevice)
>>         dev->removal_type = ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_EJECT;
>>         device_release_driver(&dev->dev);
>>
>> -       if (!rmdevice)
>> -               return 0;
>> -
>> -       /*
>> -        * unbind _ADR-Based Devices when hot removal
>> -        */
>> -       if (dev->flags.bus_address) {
>> -               if ((dev->parent) && (dev->parent->ops.unbind))
>> -                       dev->parent->ops.unbind(dev);
>> -       }
>> -       acpi_device_unregister(dev, ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_EJECT);
>> +       if (rmdevice)
>> +               acpi_device_unregister(dev, ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_EJECT);
>>
>>         return 0;
>>  }
> 
> for pci root bus, acpi_bus_trim() is used to remove acpi_device.
> 
> and later in acpi_pci_root_remove to stop pci drivers/ioapic driver,
> iommu driver then remove pci devices.
> 
> if call back is removed there, then could some functions in
> acpi_pci_unbind() will be skipped.
> 
> I really do not want to add pci_stop_bus_devices() in
> pci_root_hp.c::handle_root_bridge_removal before
> calling acpi_bus_trim...
Hi Yinghai,
	We are working on a ACPI based hotplug framework for CPU, memory and IOH.
With our framework, the sequence to remove a IOH is:
1) unbind all PCI device drivers for affected PCI devices.
2) stop and remove all affected PCI devices.
3) stop ACPI ioapic drivers(a new driver like PCI version).
4) destroy all ACPI devices.

--Gerry
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Yinghai
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-17 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-15  3:05 [PATCH v2 0/9] enhance PCI related drivers to handle hotplug events Jiang Liu
2012-09-15  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] PCI: make PCI device create/destroy logic symmetric Jiang Liu
2012-09-15  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] PCI: split registration of PCI bus devices into two stages Jiang Liu
2012-09-15  8:03   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-15 18:47     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-16 13:16       ` [PATCH v3] " Jiang Liu
2012-09-15  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] PCI: preserve dev->subordinate until pci_stop_dev() has been called Jiang Liu
2012-09-15  5:09   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-15  7:02     ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-15  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] ACPI/pci_bind: correctly update binding relationship for PCI hotplug Jiang Liu
2012-09-15  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] ACPI/pci-bind: remove bind/unbind callbacks from acpi_device_ops Jiang Liu
2012-09-15 18:53   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-16 14:09     ` [PATCH v3] " Jiang Liu
2012-09-16 16:49       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-16 18:02         ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-17  3:06           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-17 15:26           ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-15 23:27   ` [PATCH v2 5/9] " Yinghai Lu
2012-09-17  3:03     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-17 14:22       ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-17 14:31     ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2012-09-17 15:41       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-15  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] ACPI/pci_slot: update PCI slot information when PCI hotplug event happens Jiang Liu
2012-09-15  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] PCI/acpiphp: update ACPI hotplug slot information when PCI hotplug happens Jiang Liu
2012-09-15  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] PCI/acpiphp: serialize access to the bridge_list list Jiang Liu
2012-09-15  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] PCI/AER: update AER configuration when PCI hotplug event happens Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5057343C.2010201@gmail.com \
    --to=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).