linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/sev: Put PSC struct on the stack in prep for unaccepted memory support
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:43:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50599c3c-eacb-7774-746c-021adf3f56e3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21d5d55640ee1c5d66501b9398858b6a6bd6546f.1659978985.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

On 8/8/22 10:16, Tom Lendacky wrote:
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
> index b8357d6ecd47..6f7268a817fc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ enum psc_op {
>  #define GHCB_HV_FT_SNP_AP_CREATION	BIT_ULL(1)
>  
>  /* SNP Page State Change NAE event */
> -#define VMGEXIT_PSC_MAX_ENTRY		253
> +#define VMGEXIT_PSC_MAX_ENTRY		64

In general, the stack-based allocation looks fine.  It might be worth a
comment in there to make it clear that this can consume stack space.

>  struct psc_hdr {
>  	u16 cur_entry;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> index c05f0124c410..275aa890611f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ static struct ghcb boot_ghcb_page __bss_decrypted __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
>   */
>  static struct ghcb *boot_ghcb __section(".data");
>  
> +/* Flag to indicate when the first per-CPU GHCB is registered */
> +static bool ghcb_percpu_ready __section(".data");

So, there's a code path that can't be entered until this is set?  Seems
like the least we can do it annotate that path with a
WARN_ON_ONCE(!ghcb_percpu_ready).

Also, how does having _one_ global variable work for indicating the
state of multiple per-cpu structures?  The code doesn't seem to delay
setting this variable until after _all_ of the per-cpu state is ready.

>  /* Bitmap of SEV features supported by the hypervisor */
>  static u64 sev_hv_features __ro_after_init;
>  
> @@ -660,7 +663,7 @@ static void pvalidate_pages(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned int npages, bool valid
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void __init early_set_pages_state(unsigned long paddr, unsigned int npages, enum psc_op op)
> +static void early_set_pages_state(unsigned long paddr, unsigned int npages, enum psc_op op)
>  {
>  	unsigned long paddr_end;
>  	u64 val;
> @@ -868,11 +871,16 @@ static void __set_pages_state(struct snp_psc_desc *data, unsigned long vaddr,
>  static void set_pages_state(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned int npages, int op)
>  {
>  	unsigned long vaddr_end, next_vaddr;
> -	struct snp_psc_desc *desc;
> +	struct snp_psc_desc desc;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Use the MSR protocol when the per-CPU GHCBs are not yet registered,
> +	 * since vmgexit_psc() uses the per-CPU GHCB.
> +	 */
> +	if (!ghcb_percpu_ready)
> +		return early_set_pages_state(__pa(vaddr), npages, op);
>  
> -	desc = kmalloc(sizeof(*desc), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> -	if (!desc)
> -		panic("SNP: failed to allocate memory for PSC descriptor\n");
> +	memset(&desc, 0, sizeof(desc));

Why is this using memset()?  The compiler should be smart enough to
delay initializing 'desc' until after the return with this kind of
construct:

	struct snp_psc_desc desc = {};
	if (foo)
		return;
	// use 'desc' here

The compiler *knows* there is no access to 'desc' before the if().


>  	vaddr = vaddr & PAGE_MASK;
>  	vaddr_end = vaddr + (npages << PAGE_SHIFT);
> @@ -882,12 +890,10 @@ static void set_pages_state(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned int npages, int op)
>  		next_vaddr = min_t(unsigned long, vaddr_end,
>  				   (VMGEXIT_PSC_MAX_ENTRY * PAGE_SIZE) + vaddr);
>  
> -		__set_pages_state(desc, vaddr, next_vaddr, op);
> +		__set_pages_state(&desc, vaddr, next_vaddr, op);
>  
>  		vaddr = next_vaddr;
>  	}
> -
> -	kfree(desc);
>  }
>  
>  void snp_set_memory_shared(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned int npages)
> @@ -1254,6 +1260,8 @@ void setup_ghcb(void)
>  		if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP))
>  			snp_register_per_cpu_ghcb();
>  
> +		ghcb_percpu_ready = true;
> +
>  		return;
>  	}
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-08 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 200+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-14 12:02 [PATCHv7 00/14] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 01/14] x86/boot: Centralize __pa()/__va() definitions Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-23 17:37   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 02/14] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:57   ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-06-17 19:28   ` Tom Lendacky
2022-06-17 20:53     ` Tom Lendacky
2022-07-21 15:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-21 15:49     ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-22 19:18       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-22 19:30         ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-25 12:23           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-25 12:38             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-25 12:53               ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-26 14:30                 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-25 13:00             ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-25 13:05               ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-05 11:49   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-05 12:09     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-05 13:38       ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-05 14:22         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-08-05 14:53           ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-05 14:41         ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-05 18:17           ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-08 15:55             ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-10 14:19     ` Mel Gorman
2022-08-15 21:08       ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-08-15 22:02         ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-29 16:02           ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-08-29 16:19             ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-06 17:50               ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-09-08 12:11                 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-09-08 16:23                   ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-09-08 19:28                     ` Mike Rapoport
2022-09-22 14:31                       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-09-24  1:03                         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-09-24  9:36                           ` Mike Rapoport
2022-09-26 12:10                           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-09-26 13:38                             ` Tom Lendacky
2022-09-26 15:42                               ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-09-26 15:42                               ` Tom Lendacky
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 03/14] mm: Report unaccepted memory in meminfo Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-26 14:33   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 04/14] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820() Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-25 13:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 05/14] x86/boot: Add infrastructure required for unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-15 10:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-15 15:05     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-17 17:16       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-25 21:33   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 06/14] efi/x86: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-22 19:58   ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-26  8:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 07/14] x86/boot/compressed: Handle " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 08/14] x86/mm: Reserve unaccepted memory bitmap Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-26  9:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-30  1:28     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-12-01  9:37       ` Mike Rapoport
2022-12-01 13:47         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 09/14] x86/mm: Provide helpers for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 10/14] x86/mm: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-23 17:19   ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-26 10:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-02 23:46     ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-03 14:02       ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-11 11:26         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-13 16:11           ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-08-13 21:13             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-13 16:04         ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-08-13 20:58           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-26 17:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-26 17:46     ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-26 20:17   ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-08-09 11:38     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-13 16:03       ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-08-13 21:02         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 11/14] x86: Disable kexec if system has " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-23 17:23   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-23 21:48     ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-06-24  2:00       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-28 23:51         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-29  0:10           ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-29  0:59             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-04  7:18               ` Dave Young
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 12/14] x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-23 17:25   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 13/14] x86/tdx: Refactor try_accept_one() Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-23 17:31   ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-26 10:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-14 12:02 ` [PATCHv7 14/14] x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-24 16:22   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-27 10:42     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-26 14:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-09 11:45     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-10 10:27       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-06-24 16:37 ` [PATCHv7 00/14] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory Peter Gonda
2022-06-24 16:57   ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-24 17:06     ` Marc Orr
2022-06-24 17:09       ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-24 17:15         ` Peter Gonda
2022-06-24 17:19         ` Marc Orr
2022-06-24 17:21           ` Peter Gonda
2022-06-24 17:47           ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-24 18:10             ` Peter Gonda
2022-06-24 18:13               ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-24 17:40   ` Michael Roth
2022-06-24 17:58     ` Michael Roth
2022-06-24 18:05     ` Peter Gonda
2022-06-27 11:30   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-27 11:54     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-06-27 12:22       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-27 16:17         ` Peter Gonda
2022-06-27 16:33           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-06-27 22:38             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-06-28 17:17               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-18 17:21                 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-18 23:32                   ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-07-19  0:31                     ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-07-19 18:29                       ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-07-19 19:13                         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-19 20:45                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-19 21:23                             ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-19 21:35                               ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-19 21:50                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-19 22:01                                   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-07-19 22:02                                   ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-19 22:08                                     ` Tom Lendacky
2022-07-20  0:26                                     ` Marc Orr
2022-07-20  5:44                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-20 17:03                                         ` Marc Orr
2022-07-22 15:07                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-21 17:12                                       ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-23 11:14                                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-28 22:01                                           ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-08-09 11:14                                           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-09 11:36                                             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-08-09 11:54                                               ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-09 21:09                                                 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-07-19  2:48                     ` Yao, Jiewen
2022-07-29 14:01 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] Provide SEV-SNP " Tom Lendacky
2022-07-29 14:01   ` [PATCH v1 1/2] x86/sev: Use per-CPU PSC structure in prep for unaccepted memory support Tom Lendacky
2022-07-29 14:18     ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-29 14:25       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-07-29 19:08         ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-29 19:22           ` Tom Lendacky
2022-07-29 19:28             ` Dave Hansen
2022-07-29 20:12               ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-03 18:11                 ` [PATCH v1.1 0/2] Provide SEV-SNP support for unaccepted memory Tom Lendacky
2022-08-03 18:11                   ` [PATCH v1.1 1/2] x86/sev: Use per-CPU PSC structure in prep for unaccepted memory support Tom Lendacky
2022-08-03 18:17                     ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-03 18:21                       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-03 18:24                         ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-03 21:03                           ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-03 21:18                             ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-03 21:34                               ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-03 21:48                                 ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-03 22:17                                   ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-03 18:18                     ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-03 18:11                   ` [PATCH v1.1 2/2] x86/sev: Add SNP-specific " Tom Lendacky
2022-07-29 14:01   ` [PATCH v1 " Tom Lendacky
2022-08-23  0:24     ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-08-23 14:28       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-23 23:28     ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-08-08 17:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Provide SEV-SNP support for unaccepted memory Tom Lendacky
2022-08-08 17:16   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/sev: Put PSC struct on the stack in prep for unaccepted memory support Tom Lendacky
2022-08-08 21:43     ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2022-08-08 22:18       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-08 22:33         ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-08 22:35           ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-12 13:03     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-12 14:11       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-12 14:33         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-12 14:51           ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-13 19:40             ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-14 13:36               ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-08 17:16   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/sev: Add SNP-specific " Tom Lendacky
2022-08-15 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Provide SEV-SNP support for unaccepted memory Tom Lendacky
2022-08-15 15:57   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/sev: Put PSC struct on the stack in prep for unaccepted memory support Tom Lendacky
2022-08-17 16:08     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17 21:17       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-08-15 15:57   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/sev: Add SNP-specific " Tom Lendacky
2022-08-18 13:39     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-25 14:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Provide SEV-SNP support for unaccepted memory Tom Lendacky
2022-08-25 14:23   ` [PATCH v4 1/4] x86/sev: Put PSC struct on the stack in prep for unaccepted memory support Tom Lendacky
2022-09-20 16:15     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-25 14:23   ` [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/sev: Allow for use of the early boot GHCB for PSC requests Tom Lendacky
2022-08-25 14:23   ` [PATCH v4 3/4] x86/sev: Use large PSC requests if applicable Tom Lendacky
2022-08-25 14:23   ` [PATCH v4 4/4] x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory support Tom Lendacky
2022-08-25 22:10     ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-08-26 21:29       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-09-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] Provide SEV-SNP support for unaccepted memory Tom Lendacky
2022-09-27 17:04   ` [PATCH v5 1/6] x86/sev: Fix calculation of end address based on number of pages Tom Lendacky
2022-09-27 17:10     ` Dave Hansen
2022-09-27 20:45       ` Tom Lendacky
2022-09-27 19:04     ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-09-27 17:04   ` [PATCH v5 2/6] " Tom Lendacky
2022-09-27 17:04   ` [PATCH v5 3/6] x86/sev: Put PSC struct on the stack in prep for unaccepted memory support Tom Lendacky
2022-09-27 17:04   ` [PATCH v5 4/6] x86/sev: Allow for use of the early boot GHCB for PSC requests Tom Lendacky
2022-09-27 17:04   ` [PATCH v5 5/6] x86/sev: Use large PSC requests if applicable Tom Lendacky
2022-09-27 17:04   ` [PATCH v5 6/6] x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory support Tom Lendacky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50599c3c-eacb-7774-746c-021adf3f56e3@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).