From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
gleb@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] kvm: Add resampling irqfds for level triggered interrupts
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:35:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5059D836.8020205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348062872.28860.24.camel@bling.home>
On 09/19/2012 04:54 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 12:10 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 09/19/2012 12:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>> >> Whoa. Can't we put the resampler entry somewhere we don't need to
>> >> search for it? Like a kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry, that's indexed by
>> >> gsi already (kvm_irq_routing_table::rt_entries[gsi]).
>> >
>> > I'm not sure why would we bother optimizing this,
>>
>> Not optimizing, simplifying.
>>
>> > but if we do, I guess we could look for the irq notifier
>> > which is already indexed by gsi.
>>
>> It's not, it's looked up in a list.
>
> I'm not sure it's a simplification because to index by gsi we suddenly
> need to care how many gsis there are. I believe that currently means we
> have to assume an ioapic. Creating a dumb list is a little bit of
> overhead, but we get to stay blissfully unaware of the gsi
> implementation. Practically we're looking at a list of 4 entries, maybe
> a few times that when we expose more PCI root bridges to the guest.
Ok. I tried to see if it would fit in the routing table, but rcu means
that we'll need to have the resampler as a pointer, not a field, and
that we'll need to migrate it to the new array when rebuilt. So it ends
up not being any simpler.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-19 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-18 3:16 [PATCH v10 0/2] kvm: level irqfd support Alex Williamson
2012-09-18 3:16 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] kvm: Provide pre-locked setup to irq ack notifier Alex Williamson
2012-09-18 3:16 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] kvm: Add resampling irqfds for level triggered interrupts Alex Williamson
2012-09-18 23:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-19 8:59 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-19 9:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-19 9:10 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-19 13:54 ` Alex Williamson
2012-09-19 14:35 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-09-19 18:23 ` Alex Williamson
2012-09-19 18:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-19 19:23 ` Alex Williamson
2012-09-19 19:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5059D836.8020205@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).