From: "Lu, Qian" <luqia@amazon.com>
To: "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"darrick.wong@oracle.com" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
amazon-linux-kernel <amazon-linux-kernel@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: XFS mounted with 'discard' option - deleting fio test files slow
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 17:17:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506FE85F-21F5-444C-876D-8C25DBB442EE@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42228B9C-D2D3-4B9C-BFCF-BC9AED4A9678@amazon.com>
Adding amazon-linux-kernel@amazon.com
On 9/7/17, 11:22 AM, "Lu, Qian" <luqia@amazon.com> wrote:
Hi XFS mailing list,
Recently we received a bug report in the XFS filesystem with 'discard' option. I have been able to reproduce this issue. I used XFS filesystem to format NVMe SSD and mounted with 'discard' option. When I tried to delete the test fio files, the session took long time. This issue is based on Linux 4.9 stable tree. I have also repeated this test with Linux 4.13, 4.12, and we are facing the same issue. Tests were repeated several times and it was consistent.
Please see details below.
1. Kernel version: Linux ip-172-31-6-243 4.9.32-15.41.amzn1.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 22 06:20:54 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
--> Interrupt with Ctrl+C
# time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
--> The session hangs and in 'blocked' state
$ dmesg
...
[ 492.329896] INFO: task rm:9231 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
...
Then I tried to backport some patches and repeated the test. The issue has been improved. Eventually 'rm' command completed but took long time(2min).
* Backported patch: 4560e78 xfs: don't block the log commit handler for discards
# fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
--> Interrupt with Ctrl+C
# time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
real 2m2.242s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m25.524s
2. With Linux 4.12 and 4.13.0-rc1, the issue has been improved and the command is not stuck. But 'rm' command still takes long time (more than 1min). Please see details below.
Kernel version: Linux version 4.13.0-rc1+ (ec2-user@ip-172-31-21-25) (gcc version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-9) (GCC)) #1 SMP Fri Jul 21 17:31:06 UTC 2017
# fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
--> Interrupt at about 37%
# time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
real 1m57.912s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m28.810s
Compare this result with:
a) XFS mounted with 'nodiscard' option: It took less than 1min to run 'rm' command.
# fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
--> Interrupt at about 39%
# time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
real 0m31.176s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m30.005s
b) EXT4 file system mounted with 'discard' option: It only took about several seconds to run 'rm' command.
# fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
--> Interrupt at about 36.2%
# time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
real 0m4.661s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m4.657s
Please note if I wait for 'fio' command 100% done, 'rm' command took less than 1s (0m0.001s).
3. Shell script which triggers the problem
sudo su -
yum install xfsprogs fio -y
mkfs.xfs -K -f -s size=4096 /dev/nvme0n1
mkdir -p /media/disk1
mount -o discard /dev/nvme0n1 /media/disk1
cd /media/disk1/
fio --name fio_test_file --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --size=5G --numjobs=8 --group_reporting
# Interrupt with Ctrl+C
time rm -rf fio_test_file.*
Best Regards,
Qian Lu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-08 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-07 18:22 XFS mounted with 'discard' option - deleting fio test files slow Lu, Qian
2017-09-07 23:34 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-08 7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-08 17:17 ` Lu, Qian [this message]
2017-09-08 23:21 ` Hao Chen
2017-09-11 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506FE85F-21F5-444C-876D-8C25DBB442EE@amazon.com \
--to=luqia@amazon.com \
--cc=amazon-linux-kernel@amazon.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).