From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751582Ab2JVHgA (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2012 03:36:00 -0400 Received: from hqemgate04.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.35]:9957 "EHLO hqemgate04.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785Ab2JVHf6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2012 03:35:58 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp05.nvidia.com on Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:29:24 -0700 Message-ID: <5084F5D1.7050005@nvidia.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:29:21 +0800 From: Mark Zhang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Warren CC: "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dt: tegra: ventana: define pinmux for ddc References: <1350626311-18131-1-git-send-email-markz@nvidia.com> <50817668.6020709@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <50817668.6020709@wwwdotorg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/19/2012 11:48 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/18/2012 11:58 PM, Mark Zhang wrote: >> Define pinmux for DDC. The DDC pinmux in Ventana is 2 pins in I2C2. > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-ventana.dts > >> - ddc { >> - nvidia,pins = "ddc", "owc", "spdi", "spdo", >> - "uac"; >> - nvidia,function = "rsvd2"; >> - }; > > So that removes the entries for 5 pin groups, yet below, entries are > only added for the ddc and pta pingroups, so the other 4 pin groups > become unconfigured. > Right. So I think it should be changed to: owc { nvidia,pins = "owc", "spdi", "spdo", "uac"; nvidia,function = "rsvd2"; }; Is this right? >> + >> + state_i2cmux_ddc: pinmux_i2cmux_ddc { >> + ddc { >> + nvidia,pins = "ddc"; >> + nvidia,function = "i2c2"; >> + }; >> + pta { >> + nvidia,pins = "pta"; >> + nvidia,function = "rsvd4"; >> + }; > > Does this actually work? The pta pingroup is configured by the "hog" > pinctrl state of the pinctrl node itself, so this state should fail to > be applied since it attempts to touch the same pingroup. > I know little about kernel pinctrl subsystem. After reading some docs and codes, I think what you mean is, in Ventana's pinmux configuration, pta pingroup has been defined as "hdmi" function and this can't be changed(non-dynamic pinmuxing). So I want to know why we have defined pta pingroup as hdmi function? Can we remove this definition to make the i2cmux above working? >> + i2cmux { > ... >> + i2c@1 { >> + reg = <1>; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + >> + smart-battery@b { >> + compatible = "ti,bq24617", "smart-battery-1.1"; >> + reg = <0xb>; >> + ti,i2c-retry-count = <2>; >> + ti,poll-retry-count = <10>; >> + }; > > That wasn't there before. Does that device actually exist on Ventana? > Adding it should be a separate patch if so, since this one is just about > introducing the I2C mux, not adding an SBS device. Was this all just > cut/paste from Seaboard without validation? > Yes, I didn't validate this. Actually, I don't know how to validate. I have no idea about SBS device. But I have checked the schematic of Ventana and it has this "bq24617" battery charge controller(for seaboard, it's bq20z75). So I agree with you not to include this part in the patch.