Re: [PATCH v2] Fix a hard coding style when determining if a device is a container.

[Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>]

Hi,

Would somebody give some comments ?

Thanks. :)

On 10/12/2012 08:31 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
> "ACPI0004","PNP0A05" and "PNP0A06" are all defined in array
> container_device_ids[], so use it, but not the hard coding style.
>
> Also, introduce a new api is_container_device() to determine if a
> device is a container device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen<tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu<isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/container.c |   17 ++++++++++++++---
>   1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/container.c b/drivers/acpi/container.c
> index 1f9f7d7..ffd76ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/container.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/container.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,19 @@ static int is_device_present(acpi_handle handle)
>   	return ((sta&  ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT) == ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT);
>   }
>
> +static int is_container_device(const char *hid)
> +{
> +	const struct acpi_device_id *container_id;
> +
> +	for (container_id = container_device_ids;
> +	     container_id->id[0]; container_id++) {
> +		if (!strcmp((char *)container_id->id, hid))
> +			return 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   /*******************************************************************/
>   static int acpi_container_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>   {
> @@ -232,10 +245,8 @@ container_walk_namespace_cb(acpi_handle handle,
>   		goto end;
>   	}
>
> -	if (strcmp(hid, "ACPI0004")&&  strcmp(hid, "PNP0A05")&&
> -	    strcmp(hid, "PNP0A06")) {
> +	if (!is_container_device(hid))
>   		goto end;
> -	}
>
>   	switch (*action) {
>   	case INSTALL_NOTIFY_HANDLER: