From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752878Ab2KVSay (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:30:54 -0500 Received: from co9ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([207.46.163.28]:3698 "EHLO co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752812Ab2KVSav (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:30:51 -0500 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.241.101;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BL2PRD0810HT003.namprd08.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -3 X-BigFish: PS-3(zzbb2dI98dI1432Izz1de0h1202h1d1ah1d2ahzz17326ah8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1155h) Message-ID: <50AD5F54.4070609@ozmodevices.com> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:10:12 +0000 From: Rupesh Gujare Organization: Ozmo Devices User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Dan Carpenter , , , Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 1/3] staging: ozwpan: Remove redundant null check before kfree in ozpd.c References: <20121120163513.GC4990@kroah.com> <1353501977-6585-2-git-send-email-rgujare@ozmodevices.com> <20121121130527.GH11248@mwanda> <50ACDA54.7040508@ozmodevices.com> <20121121161859.GI6186@mwanda> <50AD0EB4.5070307@ozmodevices.com> <20121121214823.GA28532@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20121121214823.GA28532@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [94.9.187.151] X-OriginatorOrg: ozmodevices.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/11/12 21:48, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:26:12PM +0000, Rupesh Gujare wrote: >> On 21/11/12 16:19, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>> When someone sends a patch there are a several possible responses: >>> 1) Ack the patch. >>> 2) Request that the submitter redo it. The downside is that no one >>> likes redoing patches. >>> 3) Reject the patch. >>> 4) Redo it yourself and say "Based on a patch from Sachin Kamat". >>> This isn't nice because everyone wants author credit. >>> 5) Redo it and get permission from the original author to give them >>> author credit get their signed-off-by. >>> >>> >> Thanks Dan >> >> I will keep it in mind in future. >> >> Sachin, >> >> Are you interested in redoing (or sending sign-off ?) for this patch >> series ? I am more than happy to accept either. > Don't worry, I'll clean up the mess here... > > Sorry Greg, But looks like you applied V1 of this patch series, rather than V2. Is that intentional ? Below is link for V2 :- http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/033339.html & yes, V2 is missing - From: Sachin Kamat -- Regards, Rupesh Gujare