linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de,
	jbe@pengutronix.de, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, highguy@gmail.com,
	broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, daniel-gl@gmx.net,
	rmallon@gmail.com, tru@work-microwave.de, sr@denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v8] gpio: Add block GPIO
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:39:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BE5F8A.2000903@antcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50BC6E11.3040203@grandegger.com>

Hi Wolfgang,

On 03/12/12 10:17, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> I re-tried v8 on my AT91-SAM9G45 board and it works fine if
> CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS is enable. Unfortunately, the access via misc device
> fails if CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS is not set. That's due to gpio_block_export()
> returning -ENOSYS in gpio_block_register().
> 
> Anyway, I really like that new GPIO block interface making life for
> applications fiddling with GPIOs much easier and faster. Just the poll
> support is missing.

Thanks for your feedback!

I'm posting an update (v9) which includes poll() support in the dev
interface.

Some issues regarding IRQ driven poll() remain:

* What would be the correct locking mechanism for the got_int flag (set
in the isr and reset on read()'s return), if necessary at all?
* There is probably an explicit interrupt configuration necessary (via
struct gpio_block, and devicetree, respectively) since there are
constellations where gpio_to_irq() isn't working. E.g., in contrast to
controllers which are aware of their IRQs and providing to_irq(), there
is typically independent wiring from GPIO expander chips' interrupt line
to individual IRQ inputs on SoCs/CPUs. Or should all this be solved via
devicetree and drivers (which should support IRQ config where possible)?
* For the same reason, the IRQ flags are currently IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
which isn't flexible. Instead, either preset by board setup/firmware, or
via interrupts config in devicetree (optional property of a GPIO block?)
* Some GPIOs' IRQs are not suitable for GPI input change detection. E.g.
on LPC32xx, I can configure the IRQ which is controlled directly by the
GPI's values as FALLING, RISING, HIGH /exclusive/ or LOW. I.e., this way
it's not possible to detect both 0->1 and 1->0 changes without
reconfiguring the GPIO controller inbetween. Other controllers provide a
dedicated interrupt on all values changes.
* Would IRQF_SHARED be appropriate to enable opening IRQ enabled GPIO
blocks multiple times?

Thanks,

Roland

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-04 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-30 18:03 [PATCH 0/6 v8] gpio: Add block GPIO Roland Stigge
2012-11-30 18:03 ` [PATCH 1/6 v8] gpio: Add a block GPIO API to gpiolib Roland Stigge
2012-11-30 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/6 v8] gpio: Add sysfs support to block GPIO API Roland Stigge
2012-11-30 18:03 ` [PATCH 3/6 v8] gpio: Add userland device interface to block GPIO Roland Stigge
2012-11-30 18:03 ` [PATCH 4/6 v8] gpiolib: Fix default attributes for class Roland Stigge
2012-11-30 18:03 ` [PATCH 5/6 v8] gpio: Add device tree support to block GPIO API Roland Stigge
2012-11-30 18:03 ` [PATCH 6/6 v8] gpio: Add block gpio to several gpio drivers Roland Stigge
2012-12-03  9:17 ` [PATCH 0/6 v8] gpio: Add block GPIO Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-04 20:39   ` Roland Stigge [this message]
2012-12-05 18:44     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-05 22:10       ` Roland Stigge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50BE5F8A.2000903@antcom.de \
    --to=stigge@antcom.de \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=daniel-gl@gmx.net \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=highguy@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbe@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=rmallon@gmail.com \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=tru@work-microwave.de \
    --cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wg@grandegger.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).