From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752012Ab2LLG7T (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:59:19 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com ([209.85.223.170]:52170 "EHLO mail-ie0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750987Ab2LLG7R (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:59:17 -0500 Message-ID: <50C82B3C.1060006@ozlabs.ru> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:59:08 +1100 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Williamson CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio powerpc: implemented IOMMU driver for VFIO References: <1354557206.1809.377.camel@bling.home> <1354865693-8060-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <1354899707.3224.86.camel@bling.home> In-Reply-To: <1354899707.3224.86.camel@bling.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/12/12 04:01, Alex Williamson wrote: >> + case VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA: { >> + vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_dma_map param; >> + struct iommu_table *tbl = container->tbl; >> + enum dma_data_direction direction; >> + unsigned long locked, lock_limit; >> + >> + if (WARN_ON(!tbl)) >> + return -ENXIO; >> + >> + minsz = offsetofend(vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_dma_map, size); >> + >> + if (copy_from_user(¶m, (void __user *)arg, minsz)) >> + return -EFAULT; >> + >> + if (param.argsz < minsz) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + if ((param.flags & VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_READ) && >> + (param.flags & VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_WRITE)) >> + direction = DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL; >> + else if (param.flags & VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_READ) >> + direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE; >> + else if (param.flags & VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_WRITE) >> + direction = DMA_FROM_DEVICE; >> + else >> + return -EINVAL; > > flags needs to be sanitized too. Return EINVAL if any unknown bit is > set or else sloppy users may make it very difficult to make use of those > flag bits later. It already returns -EINVAL on any bit set except READ/WRITE, no? -- Alexey