From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: MMU: simplify set_spte
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:06:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FFB609.9000205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FFB5A1.5090708@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
For the logic, the function can be divided into two parts: one is adjusting
pte_access, the rest one is setting spte according the pte_access. It makes
the code more readable
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index a999755..af8bcb2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -2336,32 +2336,13 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
return 0;
spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK;
- if (!speculative)
- spte |= shadow_accessed_mask;
-
- if (pte_access & ACC_EXEC_MASK)
- spte |= shadow_x_mask;
- else
- spte |= shadow_nx_mask;
-
- if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK)
- spte |= shadow_user_mask;
-
- if (level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
- spte |= PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
- if (tdp_enabled)
- spte |= kvm_x86_ops->get_mt_mask(vcpu, gfn,
- kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn));
if (host_writable)
spte |= SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
else
pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
- spte |= (u64)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-
if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) {
-
/*
* Other vcpu creates new sp in the window between
* mapping_level() and acquiring mmu-lock. We can
@@ -2369,11 +2350,9 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
* be fixed if guest refault.
*/
if (level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL &&
- has_wrprotected_page(vcpu->kvm, gfn, level))
+ has_wrprotected_page(vcpu->kvm, gfn, level))
goto done;
- spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
-
/*
* Optimization: for pte sync, if spte was writable the hash
* lookup is unnecessary (and expensive). Write protection
@@ -2381,21 +2360,43 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
* Same reasoning can be applied to dirty page accounting.
*/
if (!can_unsync && is_writable_pte(*sptep))
- goto set_pte;
+ goto out_access_adjust;
if (mmu_need_write_protect(vcpu, gfn, can_unsync)) {
pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %llx, marking ro\n",
__func__, gfn);
ret = 1;
pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
- spte &= ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE);
}
}
+out_access_adjust:
+ if (!speculative)
+ spte |= shadow_accessed_mask;
+
+ if (pte_access & ACC_EXEC_MASK)
+ spte |= shadow_x_mask;
+ else
+ spte |= shadow_nx_mask;
+
+ if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK)
+ spte |= shadow_user_mask;
+
if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK)
+ spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
+
+ if (level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
+ spte |= PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
+
+ if (tdp_enabled)
+ spte |= kvm_x86_ops->get_mt_mask(vcpu, gfn,
+ kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn));
+
+ spte |= (u64)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ if (is_writable_pte(spte))
mark_page_dirty(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
-set_pte:
if (mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte))
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
done:
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 10:04 [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: MMU: lazily drop large spte Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-23 10:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: MMU: cleanup mapping-level Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-23 10:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: MMU: simplify mmu_set_spte Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-29 0:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-29 2:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-29 21:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-30 3:22 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-23 10:06 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-01-23 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: MMU: introduce vcpu_adjust_access Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-24 10:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-01-24 11:33 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-23 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: MMU: introduce a static table to map guest access to spte access Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-25 0:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-25 2:46 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-29 0:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-29 1:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-29 13:16 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-01-30 3:53 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-23 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: MMU: remove pt_access in mmu_set_spte Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-23 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: MMU: cleanup __direct_map Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-23 10:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_spte_establish Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-23 10:09 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: MMU: unify the code of walking pte list Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-27 13:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-01-29 3:01 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-23 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: MMU: fix spte assertion Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-23 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: MMU: fast drop all spte on the pte_list Xiao Guangrong
2013-01-27 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: MMU: lazily drop large spte Gleb Natapov
2013-01-29 2:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FFB609.9000205@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).