From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: labbott@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org,
Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com, bp@suse.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, asit.k.mallick@intel.com,
rkrcmar@redhat.com, karahmed@amazon.de, hpa@zytor.com,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
ashok.raj@intel.com, arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dwmw2@infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
arjan@linux.intel.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, joro@8bytes.org, aarcange@redhat.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 18:23:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50c5d627-8975-184b-b50f-4cc02c5816c5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c0b0879-3448-43e4-8380-4708fc787113@default>
On 01/25/2018 06:11 PM, Liran Alon wrote:
> It is true that attacker cannot speculate to a kernel-address, but it
> doesn't mean it cannot use the leaked kernel-address together with
> another unrelated vulnerability to build a reliable exploit.
The address doesn't leak if you can't execute there. It's the same
reason that we don't worry about speculation to user addresses from the
kernel when SMEP is in play.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-26 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-26 2:11 [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation Liran Alon
2018-01-26 2:23 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2018-01-26 9:11 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-26 17:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 17:29 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 17:31 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 17:59 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-26 18:11 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 18:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2018-01-26 18:26 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 18:28 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-26 18:43 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 18:44 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-26 18:53 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 19:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-26 19:11 ` Hansen, Dave
2018-01-27 13:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-27 15:55 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-26 19:11 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 8:46 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-26 2:50 Liran Alon
2018-01-26 2:55 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-23 11:13 Liran Alon
2018-01-25 22:20 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-22 22:15 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2018-01-20 19:22 [RFC 00/10] Speculation Control feature support KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-20 19:23 ` [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-21 19:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-23 16:12 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-23 16:20 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-23 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-23 22:49 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-23 23:14 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-23 23:22 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-24 0:47 ` Tim Chen
2018-01-24 1:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-24 1:22 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-24 1:59 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-24 3:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-21 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-21 20:28 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 21:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-21 22:00 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-22 16:27 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 9:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 9:37 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 15:01 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-23 9:30 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 10:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 10:27 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 10:57 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 10:35 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-04 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-04 20:22 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-06 9:14 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-25 16:19 ` Mason
2018-01-25 17:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-29 11:59 ` Mason
2018-01-24 0:05 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-23 20:16 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50c5d627-8975-184b-b50f-4cc02c5816c5@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).