linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] zram: Fix deadlock bug in partial write
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:11:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5107760ca0614_5bf811b9fe4132b@golgotha.mail> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130128232145.GA2666@blaptop>

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> How about this?
> ------------------------- >8 -------------------------------
> 
> From 9f8756ae0b0f2819f93cb94dcd38da372843aa12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:58:52 +0900
> Subject: [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] zram: Fix deadlock bug in partial read/write
> 
> Now zram allocates new page with GFP_KERNEL in zram I/O path
> if IO is partial. Unfortunately, It may cause deadlock with
> reclaim path like below.
> 
> write_page from fs
> fs_lock
> allocation(GFP_KERNEL)
> reclaim
> pageout
> 				write_page from fs
> 				fs_lock <-- deadlock
> 
> This patch fixes it by using GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_NOIO.
> In read path, we called kmap_atomic so that we need GFP_ATOMIC
> while we need GFP_NOIO in write path.

The patch description makes sense now. Thanks!

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> We could use GFP_IO instead of GFP_ATOMIC in zram_bvec_read with
> some modification related to buffer allocation in case of partial IO.
> But it needs more churn and prevent merge this patch into stable
> if we should send this to stable so I'd like to keep it as simple
> as possbile. GFP_IO usage could be separate patch after we merge it.

I don't see why something like below couldn't be merged for stable.
Going for GFP_ATOMIC might seem like the simplest thing to go for but
usually bites you in the end.

			Pekka

------------------------- >8 -------------------------------

>From 936a12b423c58542628d6fd683e859f752eb3d41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:58:52 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] zram: Fix deadlock bug in partial read/write

Now zram allocates new page with GFP_KERNEL in zram I/O path
if IO is partial. Unfortunately, It may cause deadlock with
reclaim path like below.

write_page from fs
fs_lock
allocation(GFP_KERNEL)
reclaim
pageout
				write_page from fs
				fs_lock <-- deadlock

This patch fixes it by using GFP_NOIO.  In read path, we
reorganize code flow so that kmap_atomic is called after the
GFP_NOIO allocation.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
[ penberg@kernel.org: don't use GFP_ATOMIC ]
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
index f2a73bd..071e058 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -228,11 +228,12 @@ static int zram_bvec_read(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	user_mem = kmap_atomic(page);
 	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
 		/* Use  a temporary buffer to decompress the page */
-		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
-	else
+		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOIO);
+
+	user_mem = kmap_atomic(page);
+	if (!is_partial_io(bvec))
 		uncmem = user_mem;
 
 	if (!uncmem) {
@@ -279,7 +280,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
 		 * This is a partial IO. We need to read the full page
 		 * before to write the changes.
 		 */
-		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOIO);
 		if (!uncmem) {
 			pr_info("Error allocating temp memory!\n");
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
-- 
1.7.11.7


  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-29  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-28  0:38 [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] zram: Fix deadlock bug in partial write Minchan Kim
2013-01-28  0:38 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 2/4] zram: force disksize setting before using zram Minchan Kim
2013-01-28  0:38 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 3/4] zram: give up lazy initialization of zram metadata Minchan Kim
2013-01-28  0:38 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] zram: get rid of lockdep warning Minchan Kim
2013-01-28  7:16 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] zram: Fix deadlock bug in partial write Pekka Enberg
2013-01-28 11:24   ` Jerome Marchand
2013-01-28 13:26     ` Pekka Enberg
2013-01-28 13:47       ` Jerome Marchand
2013-01-28 23:21   ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-29  7:11     ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2013-01-30  1:32       ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-30  4:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-30  8:21   ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-31  5:41     ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5107760ca0614_5bf811b9fe4132b@golgotha.mail \
    --to=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=konrad@darnok.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).