From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751235Ab3BFFIV (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 00:08:21 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:48262 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750716Ab3BFFIS (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 00:08:18 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,613,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="287176752" Message-ID: <5111E568.9020408@intel.com> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:08:56 +0800 From: Alex Shi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de, pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Zhang, Rui" Subject: Re: [patch v4 0/18] sched: simplified fork, release load avg and power awareness scheduling References: <1358996820-23036-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <510F1064.1060302@intel.com> <20130204110959.GE24173@gmail.com> <51106DE0.1060103@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <51106DE0.1060103@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org BTW, Since numa balance scheduling is also a kind of cpu locality policy, it is natural compatible with power aware scheduling. The v2/v3 of this patch had developed on tip/master, testing show above 2 scheduling policy work together well. -- Thanks Alex