From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754237Ab3BFNyJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:54:09 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:53168 "EHLO mail-ea0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750951Ab3BFNyD (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:54:03 -0500 Message-ID: <51126078.2050504@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:54:00 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20130124 Thunderbird/19.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Borislav Petkov CC: Borislav Petkov , Bjorn Helgaas , x86@kernel.org, lkml , Konstantin Khlebnikov Subject: Re: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0. References: <20130129202848.GE25415@pd.tnic> <3066730.6MVSAfNyye@vostro.rjw.lan> <20130131131034.GF4926@pd.tnic> <2293454.v8QRHr8txR@vostro.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <2293454.v8QRHr8txR@vostro.rjw.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/03/2013 12:04 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, January 31, 2013 02:10:34 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:12:58PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> Yes, there are two bugs in e1000e, it appears. Konstantin's >>> patch [2/5] fixes one of them, but the other one has to be fixed >>> differently. >>> >>> Boris, would you be able to test a couple of e1000e patches for me? >> >> Sure, send them on. You can add 2/5 in the mix too. > > There you go. > > The [2/5] is at: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2001211/ > > The other two are attached. I suppose the ordering doesn't matter. Just a side question, are these going to be merged some time soon? I don't even see them in -next and I would like to backport them to opensuse as they affect also 3.7... -- js suse labs