From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933336Ab3BLT2D (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:28:03 -0500 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:59523 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932293Ab3BLT2B (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:28:01 -0500 Message-ID: <511A97BD.9010707@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:27:57 -0700 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely CC: Michal Marek , Grant Likely , Srinivas KANDAGATLA , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Scott Wood , Stephen Warren , Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH V8] kbuild: create a rule to run the pre-processor on *.dts files References: <1360091188-24063-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <20130208144527.0D8DD3E2C01@localhost> <51156D09.7060401@gmail.com> <20130208220448.EDA773E2C27@localhost> <51157F65.2050309@wwwdotorg.org> <5119425A.1090802@wwwdotorg.org> <20130212180805.556C93E1202@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20130212180805.556C93E1202@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/12/2013 11:08 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:11:22 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 02/08/2013 08:45 AM, Grant Likely wrote: >>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:06:28 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> Create cmd_dtc_cpp to run the C pre-processor on *.dts file before >>>> passing them to dtc for final compilation. This allows the use of #define >>>> and #include within the .dts file. >> ... >>> I've applied this and was going to push it out, but I've just thought of >>> a problem that could be a show stopper. ... >> >> Grant, I notice this showed up in next-20130211 as: >> >> 22435f3 kbuild: create a rule to run the pre-processor on *.dts files >> >> Was that intentional? I assumed you wanted me to rework this before >> you'd apply it, rather than sending an incremental patch. > > Yes it was intentional. I sat on my hands w.r.t. this patch for long > enough that I didn't want to delay it any longer. However, I still want > a solution to the problem discussed above before it becomes a > maintenance disaster. OK, I'll send an incremental patch to adjust the include paths. It should be soon; I think I have it written, but am distracted fixing up Tegra clock driver issues etc.:-(