From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756710Ab3BRDNc (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:13:32 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:44579 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755423Ab3BRDNb (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:13:31 -0500 Message-ID: <51219C56.8060504@canonical.com> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:13:26 -0500 From: Joseph Salisbury User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tanaka Takahisa CC: Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Kernel Team Subject: Re: [v3.8 Regression] watchdog: sp5100_tco: Add SB8x0 chipset support References: <511D0BCC.9070208@canonical.com> <20130215073210.GM7867@spo001.leaseweb.com> <511E4C43.7080403@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/17/2013 04:44 AM, Tanaka Takahisa wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > 2013/2/15 Joseph Salisbury : >> On 02/15/2013 02:32 AM, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: >>> Hi Joseph, >>> >>>> A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. It was found that >>>> reverting the following commit resolved this bug: >>>> >>>> commit 740fbddf5c3f9ad8b23c5d917ba1cc7e376a5104 >>>> Author: Takahisa Tanaka >>>> Date: Sun Dec 2 14:33:18 2012 +0900 >>>> >>>> watchdog: sp5100_tco: Add SB8x0 chipset support >>>> >>>> >>>> The regression was introduced as of v3.8-rc1. >>>> >>>> I see that you are the author of this patch, so I wanted to run this by >>>> you. I was thinking of requesting a revert for v3.8, but I wanted to >>>> get your feedback first. >>> Please check out the attached patches first (They are allready in >>> linux-next). >> Thanks for the feedback, Wim. I'll let you know if the patches resolve this >> bug. >> >> >>> Other references: >>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43176 >>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43176 >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Wim. > Thank you for your information, and sorry for the late reply. > > I think that I will get rid of code that re-programming the chipset > registers, if my patch set doesn't resolve the problem. > I'm waiting for your reply at the moment. > > > Regards, > Takahisa Hi Takahisa, The bug report tested a kernel with the patches. However, he reports the kernel panic still occurs[0]. Thanks, Joe [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1116835