From: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [-rc7 regression] Buggy commit: "mm: use aligned zone start for pfn_to_bitidx calculation"
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:42:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <512275FF.9050508@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130218142440.GA29814@suse.de>
On 2/18/2013 6:46 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:26:30AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> c060f943d092 may be related as you config does not have
>>>> CONFIG_SPARSEMEM defined.
>>>
>>> Right, that's the commit causing the x86 regression:
>>>
>>> c060f943d0929f3e429c5d9522290584f6281d6e is the first bad commit
>>> commit c060f943d0929f3e429c5d9522290584f6281d6e
>>> Date: Fri Jan 11 14:31:51 2013 -0800
>>>
>>> mm: use aligned zone start for pfn_to_bitidx calculation
>>
>> Ok, looking more at this, I don't really want to revert it, and I have
>> an idea of what is wrong.
>>
>> When we allocate the zone use bitmap, we do not take the
>> zone_start_pfn into account. So I *think* that what happens is that
>> "pfn_to_bitidx()" simply overruns the allocation for unaligned zonesm
>> and the spinlock just happens to be right after (or the overrun causes
>> some other memory corruption that then indirectly causes the spinlock
>> corruption).
>>
>
> More likely the latter. I'd expect the usemap to be adjacent to the
> zone->wait_table because of when they are allocated by the bootmem
> allocator. This would break wait_on_page_[locked|writeback] at the very
> least. If page_waitqueue() returned a corrupt pointer from the wait table
> then it would lead to further corruption elsewhere each time wait_on_page_foo
> was called.
>
>> So I'm wondering if the fix is simply something like the attached
>> patch. It takes the zone_start_pfn into account when allocating the
>> zone bitmap.
>>
>> Laura? Mel?
>>
>
> Looks correct to me and should cc stable@vger.kernel.org
>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
>
I had convinced myself when I sent the patch that everything would just
shift down and there wouldn't need to be an array size increase. Looks
like my math was bogus and I'll double check it next time. The updated
version looks okay to me and I'll pull in the patch for more testing on
the setup that originally found the problem this week.
Thanks,
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-18 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-08 21:51 Linux v3.8-rc7 Linus Torvalds
2013-02-10 0:14 ` [REGRESSION] -rc7/-rc4+: unable to USB boot - enumeration partially broken (was: Linux v3.8-rc7) Andreas Mohr
2013-02-10 14:05 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-12 16:07 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-12 16:16 ` Greg KH
2013-02-12 21:25 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 6:44 ` [REGRESSION] [nailed] USB boot failure: USB: EHCI: make ehci-pci a separate driver Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 7:16 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 7:44 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 10:05 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 10:50 ` Colin Guthrie
2013-02-13 16:13 ` Andreas Mohr
2013-02-13 16:26 ` Colin Guthrie
2013-02-13 11:10 ` [-rc7 regression] Block IO/VFS/ext3/timer spinlock lockup? Ingo Molnar
2013-02-13 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-13 23:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-14 14:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-14 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-14 15:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-14 17:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-14 18:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-15 11:44 ` [-rc7 regression] Buggy commit: "mm: use aligned zone start for pfn_to_bitidx calculation" Ingo Molnar
2013-02-15 22:06 ` Greg KH
2013-02-16 8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-01 16:50 ` Greg KH
2013-03-01 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-01 17:14 ` Greg KH
2013-02-16 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-16 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-16 19:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-16 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-18 8:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-18 14:46 ` Mel Gorman
2013-02-18 18:42 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2013-02-14 23:05 ` [-rc7 regression] Block IO/VFS/ext3/timer spinlock lockup? Linus Torvalds
2013-02-15 11:39 ` [PATCH] spinlock/debugging: Print out lock name when available Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=512275FF.9050508@codeaurora.org \
--to=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).