From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934431Ab3BSVvS (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:51:18 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:46574 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933697Ab3BSVvR (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:51:17 -0500 Message-ID: <5123F32B.3000401@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:48:27 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Cyrill Gorcunov , Michal Marek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, xemul@parallels.com, Andrey Vagin , KOSAKI Motohiro , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Glauber Costa , Andi Kleen , Tejun Heo , Matt Helsley , Pekka Enberg , Eric Dumazet , Vasiliy Kulikov , Alexey Dobriyan , Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] kcmp: Make it to depend on CONFIG_KCMP References: <20130219064800.719149796@openvz.org> <20130219065210.030802820@openvz.org> <5123444D.6000806@suse.cz> <20130219093154.GF20312@moon> <5123BC2B.6000304@zytor.com> <20130219182838.GL20312@moon> <20130219134256.f4cedf44.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20130219134256.f4cedf44.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/19/2013 01:42 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: >> Index: linux-2.6.git/kernel/Makefile >> =================================================================== >> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/kernel/Makefile >> +++ linux-2.6.git/kernel/Makefile >> @@ -25,9 +25,7 @@ endif >> obj-y += sched/ >> obj-y += power/ >> >> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE),y) >> -obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += kcmp.o >> -endif >> +obj-$(CONFIG_KCMP) += kcmp.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_FREEZER) += freezer.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PROFILING) += profile.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_STACKTRACE) += stacktrace.o > > This permits people to select kcmp with CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE=n. > Is there any point in doing that? > > What would be wrong with just doing > > obj-$(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) += kcmp.o > The real question is if there are any potential use cases of kcmp() outside checkpoint/restore. It is actually a very general facility. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.