linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de, pjt@google.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Subject: Re: [patch v5 06/15] sched: log the cpu utilization at rq
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:39:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5124BD07.4050401@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361352643.10155.4.camel@laptop>

Hi,

>>  /*
>>   * This is the main, per-CPU runqueue data structure.
>>   *
>> @@ -481,6 +484,7 @@ struct rq {
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  	struct sched_avg avg;
>> +	unsigned int util;
>>  };
>>  
>>  static inline int cpu_of(struct rq *rq)
> 
> You don't actually compute the rq utilization, you only compute the
> utilization as per the fair class, so if there's significant RT activity
> it'll think the cpu is under-utilized, whihc I think will result in the
> wrong thing.

Correct me if I am wrong,but isn't the current load balancer also
disregarding the real time tasks to calculate the domain/group/cpu level
load too?

What I mean is,if the answer to the above question is yes,then can we
safely assume that the furthur optimizations to the load balancer like
the power aware scheduler and the usage of per entity load tracking can
be done without considering the real time tasks?

Regards
Preeti U Murthy
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-20 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-18  5:07 [patch v5 0/15] power aware scheduling Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 01/15] sched: set initial value for runnable avg of sched entities Alex Shi
2013-02-18  8:28   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-18  9:16     ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 02/15] sched: set initial load avg of new forked task Alex Shi
2013-02-20  6:20   ` Alex Shi
2013-02-24 10:57     ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-25  6:00       ` Alex Shi
2013-02-28  7:03         ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-25  7:12       ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 03/15] Revert "sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 04/15] sched: add sched balance policies in kernel Alex Shi
2013-02-20  9:37   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-20 13:40     ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 15:41       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-21  1:43         ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 05/15] sched: add sysfs interface for sched_balance_policy selection Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 06/15] sched: log the cpu utilization at rq Alex Shi
2013-02-20  9:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 12:09     ` Preeti U Murthy [this message]
2013-02-20 13:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 14:36         ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 14:33     ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 15:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-21  1:35         ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 15:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-25  2:26         ` Alex Shi
2013-03-22  8:49         ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 12:19   ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-20 12:39     ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 07/15] sched: add new sg/sd_lb_stats fields for incoming fork/exec/wake balancing Alex Shi
2013-02-20  9:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 12:27     ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 08/15] sched: move sg/sd_lb_stats struct ahead Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 09/15] sched: add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake Alex Shi
2013-02-20  9:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 12:09     ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 13:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 14:23         ` Alex Shi
2013-02-21 13:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-21 14:40             ` Alex Shi
2013-02-22  8:54               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-24  9:27                 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-24  9:49                   ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-24 11:55                     ` Alex Shi
2013-02-24 17:51                   ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-25  2:23                     ` Alex Shi
2013-02-25  3:23                       ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-25  9:53                         ` Alex Shi
2013-02-25 10:30                           ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 10/15] sched: packing transitory tasks in wake/exec power balancing Alex Shi
2013-02-18  8:44   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-18  8:56     ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20  5:55       ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20  7:40         ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-20  8:11           ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20  8:43             ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-20  8:54               ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 11/15] sched: add power/performance balance allow flag Alex Shi
2013-02-20  9:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 12:04     ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 13:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 13:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 14:08           ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 13:52         ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 12:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-20 14:20     ` Alex Shi
2013-02-20 15:22       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-21  1:32         ` Alex Shi
2013-02-21  9:42           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-21 14:52             ` Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 12/15] sched: pull all tasks from source group Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 13/15] sched: no balance for prefer_sibling in power scheduling Alex Shi
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 14/15] sched: power aware load balance Alex Shi
2013-03-20  4:57   ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-21  7:43     ` Alex Shi
2013-03-21  8:41       ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-21  9:27         ` Alex Shi
2013-03-21 10:27           ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-22  1:30             ` Alex Shi
2013-03-22  5:14               ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-25  4:52                 ` Alex Shi
2013-03-29 12:42                   ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-29 13:39                     ` Alex Shi
2013-03-30 11:25                       ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-03-30 14:04                         ` Alex Shi
2013-03-30 15:31                           ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-18  5:07 ` [patch v5 15/15] sched: lazy power balance Alex Shi
2013-02-18  7:44 ` [patch v5 0/15] power aware scheduling Alex Shi
2013-02-19 12:08 ` Paul Turner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5124BD07.4050401@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).