From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751668Ab3BUJjY (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:39:24 -0500 Received: from natasha.panasas.com ([67.152.220.90]:45712 "EHLO natasha.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751047Ab3BUJjV (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:39:21 -0500 Message-ID: <5125EAB1.9070002@panasas.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:36:49 +0200 From: Boaz Harrosh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Darrick J. Wong" CC: Andrew Morton , , , , , , , , , Artem Bityutskiy , , Adrian Hunter , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ubifs: Wait for page writeback to provide stable pages References: <20130119011231.20902.55954.stgit@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130119011316.20902.56721.stgit@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130123134312.b69c53cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20130221034834.GA4055@blackbox.djwong.org> In-Reply-To: <20130221034834.GA4055@blackbox.djwong.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/21/2013 05:48 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:43:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:13:16 -0800 >> "Darrick J. Wong" wrote: >> >>> When stable pages are required, we have to wait if the page is just >>> going to disk and we want to modify it. Add proper callback to >>> ubifs_vm_page_mkwrite(). >>> >>> CC: Artem Bityutskiy >>> CC: Adrian Hunter >>> CC: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org >>> From: Jan Kara >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara >>> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong >> >> A couple of these patches had this From:Jan strangely embedded in the >> signoff area. I have assumed that they were indeed authored by Jan. >> >> Please note that authorship is indicated by putting the From: line >> right at the start of the chagnelog. >> >> >> I grabbed the patches. They should appear in linux-next tomorrow if I >> can get the current pooppile to build. > > Well... these patches have been banging around in -next for a month or so now. > As far as I know there haven't been any complaints. Can we push these for 3.9? > Yes, please I'm waiting for these patches as well. Lets push them this merge window. I was sure they would get in at 3.8, but they didn't. What's the delay? [Using this I can fix a theoretical raid corruption in exofs local access, which no one really cared because exofs is always accessed via pnfs, which does not have that bug] Thanks Boaz > --D >