From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1759968Ab3BZR7p (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:59:45 -0500
Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]:51913 "EHLO
	mail-qa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1759781Ab3BZR7l (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:59:41 -0500
Message-ID: <512CF809.8010102@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:59:37 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ACPI and power management fixes for v3.9-rc1
References: <1663657.ypAtqGpGAq@vostro.rjw.lan> <1781256.mPQbtiUPYR@vostro.rjw.lan> <CA+55aFyzjN_wMH+2RCEA+aNLY0Z7fn4YU7VOtTALbgngn1+vCw@mail.gmail.com> <2223198.XmyRLgb3Gv@vostro.rjw.lan> <20130226161049.GA9303@kahuna> <CA+55aFy24fp+9zXiDmAgvsz6YvWQh2L0BAJ2hAhF7cNSdyMd8w@mail.gmail.com> <CA+55aFyu5woJsH2y3y=w4UFneOG8hKz_cLXgZQbJzn5asn8=hQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130226163712.GA30433@htj.dyndns.org> <CA+55aFyFRbMX9G_0Mv0nUZgw9mHAPzE0zCw5mCSbGG_r1diFHg@mail.gmail.com> <20130226165813.GB30433@htj.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130226165813.GB30433@htj.dyndns.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 02/26/2013 11:58 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:47:30AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> Anyway, in the US it is definitely not a common term for normal people.
>
> Googling "odd" doesn't give anything on optical drives on the first
> page.  On the other hand, >70% is about optical drives on naver.com.
> The discrepancy is funny given that most computer terms in Korea come
> from US.  Maybe it's because the character combination "odd" doesn't
> have any other meaning.  Even then, I'm surprised there's no optical
> drive result at all in the first page of google search.  Definitely
> doesn't seem like a common term in US.

There is just a lot more "odd" goings-on in the US.  Korea is simply 
less odd than the US :)

Will send a patch to fix...

	Jeff